Subscription Management Products

Products shown on the Grid for Subscription Management have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by December 25, 2015. Products are ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, vendor size, and social impact) and placed into four categories on the Grid:
  • Leaders offer subscription management products that are rated highly by G2 Crowd users and have substantial scale, market share, and global support and service resources.
  • High Performers provide products that are highly rated by their users, but have not yet achieved the market share and scale of the vendors in the Leader category. High Performers products include: Stripe, Chargebee, and FastSpring
  • Contenders have significant market presence and resources, but their products have received below average user satisfaction ratings or have not yet received a sufficient number of reviews to validate their products. Contenders products include: Braintree
  • Niche products do not have the market presence of the Leaders. They may have been rated positively on customer satisfaction, but have not yet received enough reviews to validate their success. Niche products include: Zuora, Chargify, Recurly, and Fusebill

Report Summary

The Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report revealed these high-level insights about the subscription management software market:

Service Matters - For all products, customer service played an important role in reviewers’ opinions. Reviewers in this category appreciated fast response times, multiple contact methods, and detailed implementation and setup materials from their software providers.

First Impressions - Reviewers complained about a lack of customizability in places where their customers interact with the subscription management software. Payment pages were a common gripe among reviewers who were unhappy when they couldn’t customize the pages to match the design of their websites.

Room to Improve - Email functionalities offered in subscription management software were rated slightly lower than other features. Reviewers called for more personalization and additional templates when using these tools to communicate with their customers. The average satisfaction ratings for email marketing, in particular, came in low at 68%. This suggests that these features have yet to be perfected by the vendors in this category.

Subscription Management Grid℠ Scores

The table below shows the satisfaction and market presence scores that determine vendor placement on the Grid℠. To learn more about each of the products, please see the Executive Summaries section.

High Performers

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Stripe
31
96
48
72
Chargebee
33
93
27
60
FastSpring
16
85
26
55

Contenders

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Braintree
15
41
53
47

Niche

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Zuora
36
25
47
36
Chargify
10
36
23
29
Recurly
16
29
28
28
Fusebill
15
30
20
25

Grid℠ Methodology

Subscription Management Definition

Subscription management software, also referred to as recurring billing and subscription billing, allows businesses with online marketplaces to manage their customer subscriptions and recurring revenue by storing payment data and processing charges on a recurring basis. Products in this category are offered as either a software suite or a standalone tool: subscription management software suites manage the subscription process from payment gateway to customer analytics, while standalone products include specialized solutions that make it easy for businesses to add subscription models to their current product or service offerings.

Subscription management software is especially popular among SaaS, digital publishing, and other e-commerce companies and integrates with other tools they use like e-commerce platforms, shopping cart tools, payment gateways, catalog management software, as well as other e-commerce tools.

Grid Rating Methodology

The Grid represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 Crowd rates subscription management products algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 Crowd users and data aggregated from online sources and social networks.

Technology buyers can use the Grid to help them quickly select the best subscription management product for their business and to find peers with similar experiences. For vendors, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.

Grid Scoring Methodology

G2 Crowd rates products and vendors based on ratings and reviews gathered from our user community, as well as data aggregated from online sources and social networks. We apply a unique, patent-pending algorithm to this data to calculate the product strength and vendor market presence scores in real time.

The satisfaction rating is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Overall Customer Satisfaction and Net Promoter Score (NPS) based on ratings by G2 Crowd users
  • Customer satisfaction with second-level product attributes based on user reviews
  • Popularity and statistical significance based on number of ratings and reviews received by G2 Crowd

The market presence score is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Number of employees for product and parent company (based on social networks and public sources)
  • Market share based on share of voice including number of ratings and reviews received
  • Vendor momentum based on web traffic and Google search trends
  • Product social impact based on Klout score and Twitter followers
  • Vendor social impact based on Klout score, Twitter, and LinkedIn followers
  • Revenue and year over year revenue growth rate (if available)
  • Age of company (number of years in operation)
  • Employee satisfaction and engagement (based on social network ratings)

Rating Changes and Dynamics

The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and social data collected by G2 Crowd up through December 25, 2015. The ratings may change as the products are further developed, the vendors grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 Crowd updates the ratings on its website in real-time as additional data is received, and we will update this report at least twice per year. By improving their products and support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, contenders may become leaders and niche vendors may become high performers.

Trust

Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. We require the use of a LinkedIn account to validate a G2 Crowd user’s identity and employer and verify all reviews manually. We do not allow users to rate their employer’s products or those of their employer’s competitors. Though we share reviews from business partners (they often contain valuable content), we filter out business partner ratings in our aggregate ratings to avoid bias.

Our G2 Crowd staff does not add any subjective input to the ratings, which are determined algorithmically based on data aggregated from publicly available online sources and social networks. Vendors cannot influence their ratings by spending time or money with us. Only the opinion of real users and data from public sources factor into the ratings.

Grid Inclusion Criteria

All products in a G2 Crowd category that have at least 10 reviews from real users of the product will be included in the Grid. Inviting other users, such as colleagues and peers to join G2 Crowd and share authentic product reviews will accelerate this process.

If a subscription management product is not yet listed on G2 Crowd and it fits the market definition above, then users are encouraged to suggest its addition to our subscription management category.

Product Executive Summaries

Executive profiles and detailed charts are included for products with 10 or more reviews.
Stripe
Stripe
31 ratings
4.7 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Stripe
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 332
  • Website: stripe.com

Highest-Rated Features

Paywall
100%
Average 92%
API / Integrations
99%
Average 89%
Security
98%
Average 94%

Lowest-Rated Features

Automated Correspondence
79%
Average 85%
Dunning
82%
Average 87%
Payment Gateway Integration
84%
Average 91%

Executive Summary

Stripe has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. Stripe received the highest Satisfaction score among subscription management products. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 94% of users believe Stripe is headed in the right direction.

Stripe is an online payments tool that functions as a payment gateway as well as a subscription management tool.

Some points of interest about Stripe in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • Stripe reviewers highlighted the product’s ease of setup and quality of support as the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that Stripe benefits their online businesses by streamlining the subscription billing process.

Based on Stripe user demographics and feedback:

  • Most Stripe reviewers work for small companies (87% at businesses with 50 employees or fewer).
  • The largest portion of Stripe reviewers, 54%, use the subscription management tool to charge both consumers and businesses.
  • Stripe achieved an average 86% user adoption.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked Stripe’s:

  • Ease of setup. Reviewers found Stripe’s extensive developer documentation very useful when integrating the software into their website.
  • Dashboard. Users said the dashboard is easy to use and some reviewers found this to be one of Stripe’s best features. Stripe’s reporting and dashboard features were rated the highest in the feature comparison.
  • API and integrations. Reviewers found Stripe to be very easy to integrate with other existing software solutions.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked Stripe’s:

  • Lack of supported regions. Reviewers complained about a lack of support for certain currencies and regions.
  • Quality of support. Some reviewers mentioned long response times when handling both technical and billing issues.

Reviewers recommended Stripe to potential users for its extensive developer documentation and ease of implementation. They advised users to make sure the currencies and regions they plan to do business with are accepted by Stripe. Users said they were likely to recommend Stripe at a rate of 94%.

Overall, users found Stripe to be an excellent solution for managing subscriptions.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

To date, a statement has not been provided by Stripe.
Chargebee
Chargebee
33 ratings
4.8 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Chargebee
  • Location: Walnut, CA
  • Founded: 2011
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 43
  • Website: www.chargebee.com

Highest-Rated Features

Interval Subscription
98%
Average 92%
On-Demand Payment
98%
Average 91%
Security
97%
Average 94%

Lowest-Rated Features

Email Marketing
77%
Average 73%
Internationalization
84%
Average 86%
Reporting and Dashboards
87%
Average 84%

Executive Summary

Chargebee has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 80% of users believe Chargebee is headed in the right direction.

Chargebee is a SaaS billing solution that allows businesses to manage their subscriptions and recurring billing.

Some points of interest about Chargebee in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • Chargebee reviewers highlighted the product’s pricing and customizability as the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that Chargebee benefits their e-commerce businesses by making it simple to scale their subscription billing.

Based on Chargebee user demographics and feedback:

  • Most Chargebee reviewers work for small companies (62% at businesses with 50 employees or fewer).
  • 100% of Chargebee reviewers use the subscription management tool to charge both consumers and businesses.
  • Chargebee achieved an average 85% user adoption.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked Chargebee’s:

  • User interface. Reviewers found Chargebee’s user interface to be intuitive and easy to use. Users also mentioned it is easy to train staff members on the software with Chargebee’s low learning curve.
  • Quality of support. Users appreciated Chargebee’s responsive support team, especially during the implementation process.
  • Flexibility. Reviewers valued Chargebee’s ability to adapt to unique subscription billing situations.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked Chargebee’s:

  • Email functionalities. Users mentioned a lack of available email templates and called for more customizability. Furthermore, users wished for more integrations with email software.
  • Reporting and analytics. Users were not impressed with Chargebee’s reporting features. Reviewers wished they could access more detailed reporting about conversions and churn.

Reviewers recommended Chargebee to potential users because of its wide range of accepted currencies and payment gateways. They advised users to consult with the support team to make sure integrating with Chargebee will be a good fit. Users said they were likely to recommend Chargebee at a rate of 96%.

Overall, users were pleased with Chargebee and found it to be a full-featured subscription management solution.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: Germain Brion, VP Customer Success and Partnerships at Chargebee

1454450025

Chargebee is a plug-and-play, subscription billing and management solution. We enable businesses to automate the backend processes of invoice generation and payment collection, working with multiple leading payment gateways such as WorldPay, PayPal, Stripe, Braintree, and Authorize.Net. Our scalable approach addresses the nuances of each customer scenario. We diligently assist companies, via custom onboarding and API implementation, phone-based customer support and free payment-flow consulting. Chargebee is PCI DSS Level 1 certified and allows for complete data portability, which means no lock-ins. We underscore this freedom with a "bootstrapper" program that allows startups to use our service for free until they can fully commit and scale. While always anticipating and evolving the subscription business model and user experience, Chargebee is truly customer-centric, empowering to our users so they can focus on their growing businesses.

FastSpring
FastSpring
16 ratings
4.8 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: FastSpring
  • Location: Santa Barbara, CA
  • Founded: 2005
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 34
  • Website: www.FastSpring.com

Highest-Rated Features

User, Role, and Access Management
97%
Average 89%
Security
96%
Average 94%
Internationalization
96%
Average 86%

Lowest-Rated Features

Reporting and Dashboards
88%
Average 84%
API / Integrations
88%
Average 89%
Pricing Flexibility
88%
Average 89%

Executive Summary

FastSpring has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 94% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 86% of users believe FastSpring is headed in the right direction.

FastSpring is a feature-rich subscription management tool.

Some points of interest about FastSpring in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • FastSpring reviewers highlighted the product’s attractive user interface and quality of support as the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that FastSpring benefits their product sales, and said that the software makes it easy to manage promotions and rebates in addition to subscription billing.

Based on FastSpring user demographics and feedback:

  • Most FastSpring reviewers work for small companies (85% at businesses with 50 employees or fewer).
  • The largest portion of FastSpring reviewers, 50%, use the subscription management tool to charge only consumers.
  • FastSpring achieved an average 99% user adoption.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked FastSpring’s:

  • Setup and Integrations. Users found it very easy to get started with FastSpring, citing quick implementation times and easy integrations. Furthermore, users appreciated that FastSpring does not require a separate payment gateway or merchant account to use.
  • Promotions and discounts. Reviewers appreciated how well FastSpring handles volume pricing and other discounts. FastSpring was rated higher than the category average for this feature (90% vs. avg. 87%).
  • Additional functionality. Reviewers enjoyed FastSpring’s all-in-one nature. Users mentioned FastSpring’s serial number feature for licensing software as a factor for choosing the product over other subscription management solutions.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked FastSpring’s:

  • Lack of customizability. Reviewers complained about an inability to customize payment pages and marketing emails to their liking. For emails, users called for features like an HTML editor and more templates. For the payment page, users wished they could customize the page to better match their websites.

Reviewers recommended FastSpring to potential users because of its breadth of features geared towards SaaS businesses like software licensing and localization. Users said they were likely to recommend FastSpring at a rate of 95%.

Overall, users were impressed with FastSpring’s functionality, and complaints were few and far between.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: Scott Halstead, SVP Business Development & Marketing at FastSpring

1454450062

FastSpring is an integrated e-Commerce platform for digital goods and services that includes full-featured Commerce, Payments, Marketing, and Merchant Management capabilities. Integral to our Commerce Engine is a robust Subscription Management functionality that supports a range of business models from simple recurring billing to complex usage-based offerings.

Our Merchant-of-Record business model vastly simplifies the process of rolling-out subscription-based businesses by removing the onus on our vendors for tax collection & remittance, chargeback management, and fraud screening. In addition, our Payments Engine enables a global transaction footprint without the hassle of local entities and merchant accounts.

The FastSpring platform currently serves businesses ranging from SMB to Enterprise scale and offers this full-range of capabilities via a single integration and a simple, flexible pricing structure.

Braintree
Braintree
15 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: PayPal (Subsidiary of eBay Inc.)
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Founded: 1998
  • 2015 Revenue: 3,100.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 14.4k
  • Website: www.paypal.com

Highest-Rated Features

Security
96%
Average 94%
One Time Charges
95%
Average 90%
Internationalization
93%
Average 86%

Lowest-Rated Features

Promotions
74%
Average 87%
Revenue Configuration
80%
Average 83%
Automated Correspondence
80%
Average 85%

Executive Summary

Braintree has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. Braintree has the largest Market Presence among subscription management products. 93% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 80% of users believe Braintree is headed in the right direction.

Braintree’s global payments platform powers payments for thousands of online and mobile commerce businesses.. Braintree was acquired by PayPal in 2013 and currently operates as a subsidiary.

Some points of interest about Braintree in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • Braintree reviewers highlighted the product’s flexibility as one of the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that Braintree benefits their e-commerce businesses by offering both one-time and subscription billing options.

Based on Braintree user demographics and feedback:

  • Most Braintree reviewers work for small companies (57% at businesses with 50 employees or fewer).
  • Braintree reviewers are equally distributed among companies who use the subscription management tool to charge businesses, consumers, or both.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked Braintree’s:

  • Flexibility. Users liked being able to customize Braintree to meet their unique needs.
  • User interface. Reviewers said the admin side of Braintree is clean and easy to use.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked Braintree’s:

  • Integrations. Reviewers found it difficult to integrate Braintree with certain sales software and e-commerce platforms. Users found that the lack of APIs makes their experience with the product difficult.
  • Customer management. Users struggled navigating customer profiles and searching for specific transactions.

Reviewers recommended Braintree to potential users because of its simple user interface. Reviewers warned potential users to make sure their existing software is compatible with Braintree before committing to the tool. Users said they were likely to recommend Braintree at a rate of 85%.

Overall, users had mixed reactions to Braintree. While most had a positive reaction, some users struggled with features essential to subscription management.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

To date, a statement has not been provided by Braintree.
Zuora
Zuora
36 ratings
3.8 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Zuora
  • Location: Foster City,CA
  • Founded: 2007
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 607
  • Website: www.zuora.com

Highest-Rated Features

Security
88%
Average 94%
On-Demand Payment
87%
Average 91%
Payment Gateway Integration
87%
Average 91%

Lowest-Rated Features

Reporting and Dashboards
68%
Average 84%
Dunning
74%
Average 87%
Internationalization
76%
Average 86%

Executive Summary

Zuora has been named a Niche Vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 78% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 78% of users believe Zuora is headed in the right direction.

Zuora is a comprehensive SaaS solution for subscription management and recurring billing.

Some points of interest about Zuora in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • Zuora reviewers highlighted the product’s flexibility and available integrations as the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that Zuora benefits their SaaS businesses by automating otherwise time consuming billing processes.

Based on Zuora user demographics and feedback:

  • Most Zuora reviewers work for mid-market businesses (65% at businesses with 51-1000 employees).
  • The largest portion of Zuora reviewers, 60%, use the subscription management tool to charge only businesses.
  • Zuora achieved an average 56% user adoption.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked Zuora’s:

  • Ease of use. Several reviewers said Zuora offers a simple, easy-to-use solution for subscription management. Users appreciated the simple user interface and said the platform is easy to learn.
  • Task automation. Users said Zuora allows them to save time by automating subscription billing and other tasks.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked Zuora’s:

  • Quality of support. Reviewers complained about slow response times and unresolved issues. Furthermore, Zuora was rated below the category average for quality of support (81% vs. avg. 90%).
  • One-time charges. Users found using this feature to be difficult and hard to manage.

Reviewers recommended Zuora to potential users because of its integrations and reporting capabilities. They advised users to research other options before committing to Zuora if they are working for an enterprise-level business. Users said they were likely to recommend Zuora at a rate of 77%.

Overall, users found Zuora to be a complete solution for managing subscriptions.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

To date, a statement has not been provided by Zuora.
Chargify
Chargify
10 ratings
4.4 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Chargify
  • Location: Needham, MA
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 21
  • Website: www.chargify.com

Highest-Rated Features

Paywall
97%
Average 92%
Dunning
96%
Average 87%
Payment Gateway Integration
96%
Average 91%

Lowest-Rated Features

Email Marketing
63%
Average 73%
Reporting and Dashboards
83%
Average 84%
Automated Correspondence
84%
Average 85%

Executive Summary

Chargify has been named a Niche Vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 90% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 100% of users believe Chargify is headed in the right direction.

Chargify is a subscription management and recurring billing software.

Some points of interest about Chargify in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • Chargify reviewers highlighted the product’s quality of support as one of the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that Chargify benefits their subscription and promotion management by streamlining both processes.

Based on Chargify user demographics and feedback:

  • Most Chargify reviewers work for small businesses (89% at companies with 50 employees or fewer).
  • The largest portions of Chargify reviewers, both 40%, use the subscription management tool to charge either only businesses or both businesses and consumers.
  • Chargify achieved an average 48% user adoption.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked Chargify’s:

  • Payment gateway integrations. Users liked Chargify’s breadth of compatible payment gateways. In fact, this feature was rated above the category average (96% vs. avg. 91%).
  • Pricing features. Reviewers said Chargify handles unique pricing situations, like promotions and one time charges, with ease.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked Chargify’s:

  • Payment page customization. Users found it difficult to customize the payment page to better match the design of their own website.
  • Reporting and analytics. Users were not impressed with Chargify’s reporting capabilities and said they were left wishing for more.

Reviewers recommended Chargify to potential users because of its ease of setup and use. They advised users to research necessary integrations before implementing Chargify. Users said they were likely to recommend Chargify at a rate of 88%.

Overall, users found Chargify to be enough to get the job done; however, the software struggled when it came to more complex features.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: Adam Feber, Director of Marketing at Chargify

1454450114

Chargify is a trusted company in the billing industry, used my thousands of small to medium sized business and a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Our billing software is extremely secure and reliable. We support a wide-range of billing scenarios, and offer elegant quantity-based and metered component billing options that rival our competitors’ offerings.

We are proud to claim our support is amongst the best in the industry. Not just because we are the only company to offer 24/7 phone support but also because our friendly customer success team is here to help customers succeed.

Outside of the fundamental subscription management and recurring billing, we provide a wide range of features that go beyond the basics to help our customers grow and succeed – features only found with a company that’s been doing this since 2010.

Chargify is based in the US, has been profitable since 2012, and continues to grow year over year.

Recurly
Recurly
16 ratings
3.9 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Recurly
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 94
  • Website: recurly.com

Highest-Rated Features

Proration
97%
Average 91%
API / Integrations
94%
Average 89%
User, Role, and Access Management
94%
Average 89%

Lowest-Rated Features

Revenue Configuration
69%
Average 83%
Internationalization
84%
Average 86%
Usage Subscription
86%
Average 90%

Executive Summary

Recurly has been named a Niche Vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 94% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 60% of users believe Recurly is headed in the right direction.

Recurly is a subscription management solution that offers an integrated payment gateway.

Some points of interest about Recurly in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • Recurly reviewers highlighted the product’s ease of use as one of the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that Recurly benefits their billing processes by automating subscriptions and handling promotions.

Based on Recurly user demographics and feedback:

  • Most Recurly reviewers work for mid-market businesses (53% at companies with 51-1000 employees).
  • The largest portion of Recurly reviewers, 60%, use the subscription management tool to charge only consumers.
  • Recurly achieved an average 85% user adoption.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked Recurly’s:

  • Ease of setup. Reviewers referred to Recurly as “developer-friendly” and said implementing the software is fast and easy. Furthermore, reviewers appreciated Recurly’s technical support during the implementation process.
  • User interface. Many reviewers said they were impressed with how easy it is to navigate Recurly’s software. Users said the interface is appealing and doesn’t bog users down with too many options.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked Recurly’s:

  • Instability. Users mentioned site downtimes and issues with the backend of the software causing frequent calls to support.
  • Payment features. Reviewers said the software is difficult to use for one time and usage-based billing.

Reviewers recommended Recurly to potential users because of its breadth of features. They advised users to research other subscription management solutions if their businesses do not require Recurly’s additional functionality. Users said they were likely to recommend Recurly at a rate of 79%.

Overall, Recurly was well-received by its users. Reviewers were happy with the available features and were not discouraged by occasional bugs.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

To date, a statement has not been provided by Recurly.
Fusebill
Fusebill
15 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Fusebill
  • Location: Ontario, Canada
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 15
  • Website: www.fusebill.com

Highest-Rated Features

Usage Subscription
90%
Average 90%
Automated Correspondence
90%
Average 85%
Proration
89%
Average 91%

Lowest-Rated Features

Internationalization
76%
Average 86%
Reporting and Dashboards
77%
Average 84%
Revenue Configuration
80%
Average 83%

Executive Summary

Fusebill has been named a Niche Vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 87% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 100% of users believe Fusebill is headed in the right direction.

Fusebill is a subscription management and recurring billing solution for small and mid-market businesses.

Some points of interest about Fusebill in G2 Crowd’s Winter 2016 Subscription Management Grid℠ Report:

  • Fusebill reviewers highlighted the product’s reporting and analytics as one of the primary reasons for switching from their prior subscription management solution.
  • Reviewers reported that Fusebill benefits their billing systems by automating processes and providing real-time analytics.

Based on Fusebill user demographics and feedback:

  • Most Fusebill reviewers work for small businesses (60% at companies with 50 employees or fewer).
  • The largest portion of Fusebill reviewers, 67%, use the subscription management tool to charge both consumers and businesses.
  • Fusebill achieved an average 86% user adoption.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, users liked Fusebill’s:

  • Automated correspondence. Reviewers appreciated options for payment confirmation emails and other customer communications. In fact, this feature was rated above the category average (90% vs. avg. 87%).
  • Pricing features. Adjusting pricing for promotions and other unique situations is easy with Fusebill, according to reviewers.

In review ratings and short-answer responses, some users disliked Fusebill’s:

  • Reporting and analytics. Users found the reporting features to be lacking. Additionally, some users mentioned bugs with the software when generating new reports.
  • Lack of integrations. Users complained about a lack of available integrations with certain accounting software.

Reviewers recommended Fusebill to potential users because of the flexibility Fusebill offers for unique billing situations. They advised users to make sure Fusebill supports all necessary payment gateways and regions. Users said they were likely to recommend Fusebill at a rate of 84%.

Overall, users found Fusebill effective in managing their subscriptions but complained that occasional bugs are troublesome.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

Vendor Position

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

To date, a statement has not been provided by Fusebill.

Satisfaction Ratings

G2 Crowd users rated subscription management software vendors' ability to satisfy their needs as shown in the table below.
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Average
Satisfaction
Likely to Recommend
94%
96%
95%
85%
77%
88%
79%
85%
87%
Product Going in Right Direction?
94%
80%
86%
80%
78%
100%
60%
100%
85%

Satisfaction by Category

Meets Requirements
93%
91%
93%
90%
78%
84%
89%
84%
88%
Ease of Admin
96%
88%
95%
84%
82%
88%
93%
90%
90%
Ease of Doing Business
95%
95%
97%
93%
79%
94%
93%
94%
92%
Quality of Support
90%
96%
99%
88%
81%
89%
87%
89%
90%
Ease of Setup
98%
87%
86%
84%
72%
82%
89%
87%
86%
Ease of Use
95%
90%
87%
87%
82%
87%
91%
89%
88%
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Average
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Net Promoter Score (NPS) (Range from -100 to +100)
84
88
88
47
14
40
25
53
55

Feature Comparison

G2 Crowd users have evaluated subscription management software products by feature. Feature ratings are representative of reviewers' overall satisfaction with each feature and do not necessarily take into account the breadth of a product's features. The results are shown below.
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Average
Pricing and Payments
Interval Subscription
92%
98%
n/a
92%
86%
94%
92%
87%
92%
Usage Subscription
95%
95%
n/a
88%
84%
n/a
86%
90%
90%
On-Demand Payment
96%
98%
n/a
86%
87%
n/a
91%
87%
91%
One Time Charges
97%
92%
n/a
95%
85%
88%
88%
86%
90%
Pricing Flexibility
96%
90%
88%
89%
84%
90%
91%
87%
89%
Promotions
92%
90%
90%
74%
79%
94%
87%
86%
87%
Payment Assurance
96%
92%
n/a
92%
82%
90%
91%
86%
90%
Dunning
82%
90%
n/a
n/a
74%
96%
92%
87%
87%
Revenue Configuration
86%
95%
n/a
80%
81%
91%
69%
80%
83%
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Average
Customer Accounts
Self-serve Portal
90%
90%
n/a
88%
80%
86%
93%
88%
88%
Paywall
100%
94%
n/a
n/a
80%
97%
93%
86%
92%
Proration
97%
92%
n/a
n/a
85%
88%
97%
89%
91%
Automated Correspondence
79%
91%
n/a
80%
81%
84%
92%
90%
85%
Email Marketing
n/a
77%
n/a
n/a
80%
63%
n/a
n/a
73%
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Average
Administration
Reporting and Dashboards
93%
87%
88%
90%
68%
83%
86%
77%
84%
API / Integrations
99%
96%
88%
89%
81%
86%
94%
81%
89%
Payment Gateway Integration
84%
95%
95%
89%
87%
96%
93%
86%
91%
User, Role, and Access Management
91%
94%
97%
91%
78%
88%
94%
83%
89%
Security
98%
97%
96%
96%
88%
94%
92%
89%
94%
Internationalization
91%
84%
96%
93%
76%
84%
76%
86%

*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question.

Customer Segments Served

Subscription management products serve a range of small, mid-market, and enterprise customers. The tables below show the breakdown by reviewers' company size and whether they use subscription management tools to charge businesses or consumers.
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Average
Customer Segments Served
Small Business (50 or fewer emp.) 84% 62% 85% 57% 3% 89% 40% 64% 60%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) 13% 28% 15% 29% 65% 11% 53% 29% 30%
Enterprise ( >1000 emp.) 3% 10% 0% 14% 32% 0% 7% 7% 9%
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Average
B2B or B2C Companies: Customers
Businesses 29% 0% 25% 33% 60% 40% 30% 33% 31%
Consumers 17% 0% 50% 33% 20% 20% 60% 0% 25%
Both 54% 100% 25% 33% 20% 40% 10% 67% 43%

Deployment and Implementation

Deployment and implementation data for subscription management products is shown below.
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Deployment Method
Cloud
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
On-Premise
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%

Implementation Method

Led by In-House Team
90%
100%
90%
100%
64%
100%
83%
100%
Led by Vendor PS
0%
0%
10%
0%
27%
0%
17%
0%
Led by 3rd Party
10%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%

Market Presence

Key data on each vendor’s overall scale and market presence is shown below.
Stripe
Chargebee
FastSpring
Braintree
Zuora
Chargify
Recurly
Fusebill
Vendor Information
Year Founded
2010
2011
2005
1998
2007
2009
2009
2010
Revenue ($MM)
n/a
n/a
n/a
$3,100
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Employees on LinkedIn (Vendor)
332
43
34
14,359
607
21
94
15
LinkedIn Followers
14,817
1,063
431
179,807
14,798
347
1,142
534
Twitter Followers (Vendor)
Klout Score (Vendor)
63.0
48.0
47.0
89.0
60.0
49.0
49.0
44.0
Alexa Web Traffic Rank
3,986
31,668
4,801
33
41,208
29,949
18,101
521,550

© 2016 G2 Crowd, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2 Crowd’s prior written permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 Crowd disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.