Learning Management System (LMS) Software

 
for Learning Management System (LMS)
G2 watermark
Grid® Scoring
Contenders
Leaders
High Performers
Niche
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Presence
Satisfaction
Sort by:
 

Learning Management System (LMS) Software Definition

Learning management systems (LMSs) are software platforms for instructors to manage and organize educational courses online and provide students a single location for all course material. LMSs are used to help streamline information between educational institutions and students over the internet, allowing for increased learning capabilities that are more accessible to the general public.

LMSs are comprised of a document management component and communication capability, allowing teachers to upload course files such as rubrics, assignments, calendars, and gradebooks, as well as communicate with students via chatrooms or forums. Many LMSs may also offer online assessment functionality, such as quizzes and tests, or offer features that integrate multimedia components such as videos and photos. Students can use LMSs to submit assignments, and many platforms allow instructors to grade assignments within the platform. LMSs work in concert with other educational platforms, such as student information systems (SISs), to deliver multiple e-learning solutions. While SISs help manage and document student data, LMS focuses on delivering online courses or training to learners.

To qualify for inclusion in the LMS category, a product must:

  • Deliver online course content to learners
  • Have scheduling and tracking capabilities
  • Be able to integrate with content creation platforms

Learning Management System (LMS) Grid® Description

Products shown on the Grid® for Learning Management System (LMS) have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by November 06, 2017. Products are ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, vendor size, and social impact) and placed into four categories on the Grid®:

New Products on Grid®

Products appearing on the LMS Grid® for the first time are Litmos by CallidusCloud, TalentLMS, Path LMS, Chamilo LMS, LatitudeLearning, Thought Industries, Edsby, Pearson LearningStudio, Engrade, PowerSchool Learning, Moodlerooms, and Infinite Campus.

Products Not Yet on Grid®

Products with fewer than 10 reviews are not included on the Grid®. Some notable products not yet included are Kannu, NEO LMS, and ProProfs Learning Management System. Users of these products are encouraged to visit the LMS category and write a review.





 

Grid® Scores for Learning Management System (LMS)

 

The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine vendor placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each of the products, please see the executive profile section.

Leaders

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
Google Classroom
154
96
84
90
Canvas
169
94
66
80
Blackboard
323
72
72
72
McGraw-Hill Connect
67
64
75
69
Litmos by CallidusCloud
55
82
54
68
Schoology
64
75
52
63
Moodle
107
69
52
60
Brightspace
71
64
57
60

High Performers

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
TalentLMS
116
96
44
70
Edmodo
70
84
49
66
Path LMS
16
83
31
57
Chamilo LMS
15
84
27
55
LatitudeLearning
45
64
37
50
Thought Industries
12
65
31
48
Edsby
21
56
33
44

Contenders

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
Pearson LearningStudio
11
35
78
56
Engrade
12
7
56
31

Niche

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
WizIQ
27
48
45
46
Sakai 11
69
48
37
42
PowerSchool Learning
12
24
44
34
Skyward Student Management Suite
21
9
45
27
Moodlerooms
28
6
48
27
Infinite Campus
10
6
41
23


 

Grid® Methodology

 

Grid® Rating Methodology

The Grid® represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 Crowd rates LMSs algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 Crowd users and data aggregated from online sources and social networks.

Technology buyers can use the Grid® to help them quickly select the best LMSs for their businesses and to find peers with similar experiences. For vendors, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid® provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.

Grid® Scoring Methodology

G2 Crowd rates products and vendors based on reviews gathered from our user community, as well as data aggregated from online sources and social networks. We apply a unique, patent-pending algorithm to this data to calculate the product strength and scores in real time. The Winter 2018 LMS Grid® Report is based off of scores calculated using the G2 Crowd algorithm v2.0 from reviews collected through November 6, 2017. To view the LMS Grid® with the most recent data, please visit the LMS page.

The Satisfaction rating is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Customer satisfaction with end user-focused product attributes based on user reviews
  • Popularity and statistical significance based on the number of reviews received by G2 Crowd
  • Quality of reviews received (reviews that are more thoroughly completed will be weighted more heavily)
  • Age of reviews (more-recent reviews provide relevant and up-to-date information that is reflective of the current state of a product)
  • Customers' satisfaction with administration-specific product attributes based on user reviews
  • Overall customer satisfaction and Net Promoter Score® (NPS) based on ratings by G2 Crowd users

The Market Presence score is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Product market presence
    • Number of employees for product (based on social networks and public sources)
    • Number of product reviews
    • Product social impact based on factors including Twitter followers and domain authority
  • Vendor market presence
    • Number of employees for parent company (based on social networks and public resources)
    • Vendor momentum based on web traffic and search trends
    • Vendor social impact based on Klout score and Twitter followers
    • Age of company (number of years in operation)
    • Employee satisfaction and engagement (based on social network ratings)

Grid® Categorization Methodology

Making G2 Crowd research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.

To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 Crowd follows a publicly available categorization methodology. All LMSs appearing on the Grid® have passed through G2 Crowd's categorization methodology and meet G2 Crowd's category standards.

Many terms that appear regularly across G2 Crowd and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding. These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid®. A list of standard definitions is available to G2 Crowd users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.

Rating Changes and Dynamics

The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and social data collected by G2 Crowd up through November 6, 2017. The ratings may change as the products are further developed, the vendors grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 Crowd updates the ratings on its website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche vendors may become High Performers.

Trust

Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. We require the use of a LinkedIn account to validate a G2 Crowd user’s identity and employer. Additionally, we verify all reviews manually. We do not allow users to rate their employers’ products or those of their employers’ competitors. Though we share reviews from business partners (they often contain valuable content), we filter out business partner ratings in our aggregate ratings to avoid bias.

Our G2 Crowd staff does not add any subjective input to the ratings, which are determined algorithmically based on data aggregated from publicly available online sources and social networks. Vendors cannot influence their ratings by spending time or money with us. Only the opinion of real users and data from public sources factor into the ratings.

Grid® Inclusion Criteria

All products in a G2 Crowd category that have at least 10 reviews from real users of the product are included on the Grid®. Inviting other users, such as colleagues and peers, to join G2 Crowd and share authentic product reviews will accelerate this process.

If an LMS is not yet listed on G2 Crowd and it fits the market definition above, then users are encouraged to suggest its addition to our LMS category.

Product Profiles

Product profiles and detailed charts are included for products with 10 or more reviews.
 

*Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix Systems, Inc.



 
Google Classroom
Google Classroom
154 ratings
4.4 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL)
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Founded: 1998
  • 2016 Revenue: $90,272.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 122k
  • Website: www.google.com

Product Synopsis

 

Google Classroom has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. Google Classroom has the largest Market Presence and received the highest Satisfaction score among Learning Management System (LMS) products. 90% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 91% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Google Classroom at a rate of 87%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
88%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
89%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
88%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
92%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
90%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
93%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Canvas
Canvas
169 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Instructure
  • Location: Salt Lake City, UT
  • Founded: 2008
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.08k
  • Website: www.instructure.com

Product Synopsis

 

Canvas has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 93% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 87% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Canvas at a rate of 85%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
87%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
85%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
88%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
86%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
88%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
82%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Blackboard
Blackboard
323 ratings
3.8 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Blackboard
  • Location: Washington, D.C.
  • Founded: 1997
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 3.24k
  • Website: blackboard.com

Product Synopsis

 

Blackboard has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 76% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 64% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Blackboard at a rate of 75%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
74%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
76%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
83%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
72%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
75%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
69%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
McGraw-Hill Connect
McGraw-Hill Connect
67 ratings
3.9 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: McGraw-Hill Education
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Founded: 1888
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 5.54k
  • Website: www.mheducation.com

Product Synopsis

 

McGraw-Hill Connect has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 82% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 74% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend McGraw-Hill at a rate of 79%. McGraw-Hill is also in the Assessment, Classroom Management, and Study Tools categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
76%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
76%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
82%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
79%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
83%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
75%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Litmos by CallidusCloud
Litmos by CallidusCloud
55 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: CallidusCloud (NASDAQ:CALD)
  • Location: Dublin, CA
  • Founded: 1996
  • 2016 Revenue: $206.7 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.21k
  • Website: www.calliduscloud.com

Product Synopsis

 

Litmos by CallidusCloud has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 89% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 82% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Litmos at a rate of 84%. Litmos is also in the Corporate LMS and Course Authoring categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
85%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
88%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
85%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
88%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
90%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
87%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Schoology
Schoology
64 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Schoology
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 303
  • Website: www.schoology.com

Product Synopsis

 

Schoology has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 91% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 84% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Schoology at a rate of 86%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
87%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
84%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
83%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
85%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
91%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
88%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Moodle
Moodle
107 ratings
3.8 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Moodle
  • Location: Perth, Australia
  • Founded: 2001
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 93
  • Website: moodle.com

Product Synopsis

 

Moodle has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 80% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 63% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Moodle at a rate of 76%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
76%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
76%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
77%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
84%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
78%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Brightspace
Brightspace
71 ratings
4.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Desire2Learn
  • Location: Kitchener, Canada
  • Founded: 1999
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 742
  • Website: www.d2l.com

Product Synopsis

 

Brightspace has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 85% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 72% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Brightspace at a rate of 80%. Brightspace is also in the Corporate LMS category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
80%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
79%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
83%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
84%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
72%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
TalentLMS
TalentLMS
116 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Epignosis eLearning Solutions
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 2012
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 45
  • Website: efrontlearning.com

Product Synopsis

 

TalentLMS has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 96% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 93% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend TalentLMS at a rate of 90%. TalentLMS is also in the Corporate LMS category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
89%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
94%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
91%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
93%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
93%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Edmodo
Edmodo
70 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Edmodo
  • Location: San Mateo, CA
  • Founded: 2008
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 144
  • Website: www.edmodo.com

Product Synopsis

 

Edmodo has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 84% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 78% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Edmodo at a rate of 83%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
90%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
88%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
88%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
95%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
91%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Path LMS
Path LMS
16 ratings
4.7 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Blue Sky eLearn
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Founded: 2002
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 44
  • Website: blueskyelearn.com

Product Synopsis

 

Path LMS has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 94% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Path LMS at a rate of 93%. Path LMS is also in the Corporate LMS category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
98%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
94%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
91%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
96%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
97%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
96%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Chamilo LMS
Chamilo LMS
15 ratings
4.9 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Chamilo Association
  • Location: Brussels, Belgium
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 6
  • Website: www.chamilo.org

Product Synopsis

 

Chamilo LMS has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Chamilo LMS at a rate of 99%. Chamilo LMS is also in the Corporate LMS category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
96%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
100%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
91%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
98%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
92%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
98%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
LatitudeLearning
LatitudeLearning
45 ratings
4.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Latitude CG
  • Location: Saline, MI
  • Founded: 2003
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 45
  • Website: www.latitudelearning.com

Product Synopsis

 

LatitudeLearning has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 71% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 86% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend LatitudeLearning at a rate of 80%. LatitudeLearning is also in the Corporate LMS category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
88%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
78%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
84%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
80%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
89%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
78%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Thought Industries
Thought Industries
12 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Thought Industries
  • Location: Boston, MA
  • Founded: 2012
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 34
  • Website: www.thoughtindustries.com

Product Synopsis

 

Thought Industries has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 92% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Thought Industries at a rate of 92%. Thought Industries is also in the Corporate LMS and Course Authoring categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
96%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
88%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
83%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
86%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
94%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
87%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Edsby
Edsby
21 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Edsby
  • Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 16
  • Website: edsby.com

Product Synopsis

 

Edsby has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 90% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Edsby at a rate of 85%. Edsby is also in the Assessment and Classroom Management categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
78%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
89%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
85%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
77%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
86%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
83%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Pearson LearningStudio
Pearson LearningStudio
11 ratings
3.7 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Pearson (NYSE: PSO)
  • Location: London, United Kingdom
  • Founded: 1998
  • 2016 Revenue: $5,625.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 29.9k
  • Website: www.pearson.com

Product Synopsis

 

Pearson LearningStudio has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 73% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 55% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Pearson at a rate of 75%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
84%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
87%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Engrade
Engrade
12 ratings
3.7 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: McGraw-Hill Education
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Founded: 1888
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 5.54k
  • Website: www.mheducation.com

Product Synopsis

 

Engrade has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 75% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 75% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Engrade at a rate of 73%. Engrade is also in the Assessment category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
69%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
82%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
83%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
WizIQ
WizIQ
27 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: WizIQ Inc.
  • Location: Haryana, India
  • Founded: 2007
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 295
  • Website: www.wiziq.com

Product Synopsis

 

WizIQ has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 89% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 88% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend WizIQ at a rate of 83%. WizIQ is also in the Corporate LMS category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
82%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
84%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
85%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
78%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
78%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
76%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Sakai 11
Sakai 11
69 ratings
3.7 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Apereo Foundation
  • Location: Westminster, CO
  • Founded: 2000
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 19
  • Website: www.apereo.org

Product Synopsis

 

Sakai 11 has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 74% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 69% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Sakai at a rate of 74%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
77%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
78%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
84%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
80%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
81%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
70%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
PowerSchool Learning
PowerSchool Learning
12 ratings
4.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: PowerSchool
  • Location: Folsom, CA
  • Founded: 1997
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 946
  • Website: www.powerschool.com

Product Synopsis

 

PowerSchool Learning has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend PowerSchool at a rate of 80%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
74%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
79%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Skyward Student Management Suite
Skyward Student Management Suite
21 ratings
3.4 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Skyward Inc.
  • Location: Stevens Point, WI
  • Founded: 1980
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 479
  • Website: www.skyward.com

Product Synopsis

 

Skyward Student Management Suite has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 67% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 75% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Skyward at a rate of 67%. Skyward is also in the School Resource Management, Special Education, Student Information Systems (SIS), and K-12 Student Information Systems categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
66%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
61%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
75%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Moodlerooms
Moodlerooms
28 ratings
3.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Blackboard
  • Location: Washington, D.C.
  • Founded: 1997
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 3.24k
  • Website: blackboard.com

Product Synopsis

 

Moodlerooms has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 46% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 48% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Moodlerooms at a rate of 59%. Moodlerooms is also in the Corporate LMS category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
68%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
66%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
74%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
62%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
67%
Average 87%
 
Ease of Setup
62%
Average 82%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Infinite Campus
Infinite Campus
10 ratings
3.5 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Infinite Campus
  • Location: Blaine, MN
  • Founded: 1993
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 397
  • Website: www.infinitecampus.com

Product Synopsis

 

Infinite Campus has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 70% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 70% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Infinite Campus at a rate of 70%. Infinite Campus is also in the School Resource Management, Student Information Systems (SIS), and K-12 Student Information Systems categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
69%
Average 82%
 
Ease of Use
71%
Average 82%
 
Meets Requirements
79%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 

Satisfaction Ratings

 
G2 Crowd users rated LMS vendors' ability to satisfy their needs as shown in the table below.
Google Classroom
Canvas
Blackboard
McGraw-Hill
Litmos
Schoology
Moodle
Brightspace
TalentLMS
Edmodo
Path LMS
Chamilo LMS
LatitudeLearning
Thought Industries
Edsby
Pearson
Engrade
WizIQ
Sakai
PowerSchool
Skyward
Moodlerooms
Infinite Campus
Average
Satisfaction
Likely to Recommend
87%
85%
75%
79%
84%
86%
76%
80%
90%
83%
93%
99%
80%
92%
85%
75%
73%
83%
74%
80%
67%
59%
70%
81%
Product Going in Right Direction?
91%
87%
64%
74%
82%
84%
63%
72%
93%
78%
100%
100%
86%
92%
90%
55%
75%
88%
69%
100%
75%
48%
70%
80%

Satisfaction by Category

Meets Requirements
88%
88%
83%
82%
85%
83%
86%
87%
87%
86%
91%
91%
84%
83%
85%
87%
83%
85%
84%
86%
75%
74%
79%
84%
Ease of Admin
92%
86%
72%
79%
88%
85%
77%
83%
91%
88%
96%
98%
80%
86%
77%
n/a
n/a
78%
80%
n/a
n/a
62%
n/a
83%
Ease of Doing Business
90%
88%
75%
83%
90%
91%
84%
84%
93%
95%
97%
92%
89%
94%
86%
n/a
n/a
78%
81%
n/a
n/a
67%
n/a
87%
Quality of Support
88%
87%
74%
76%
85%
87%
76%
80%
89%
90%
98%
96%
88%
96%
78%
84%
69%
82%
77%
74%
66%
68%
69%
82%
Ease of Setup
93%
82%
69%
75%
87%
88%
78%
72%
93%
91%
96%
98%
78%
87%
83%
n/a
n/a
76%
70%
n/a
n/a
62%
n/a
82%
Ease of Use
89%
85%
76%
76%
88%
84%
76%
79%
94%
88%
94%
100%
78%
88%
89%
87%
82%
84%
78%
79%
61%
66%
71%
82%
Google Classroom
Canvas
Blackboard
McGraw-Hill
Litmos
Schoology
Moodle
Brightspace
TalentLMS
Edmodo
Path LMS
Chamilo LMS
LatitudeLearning
Thought Industries
Edsby
Pearson
Engrade
WizIQ
Sakai
PowerSchool
Skyward
Moodlerooms
Infinite Campus
Average
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Net Promoter Score (NPS) (Range from -100 to +100)
54
48
6
33
36
50
10
18
65
39
75
100
18
75
52
9
25
59
1
17
-14
-39
0
32

*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question.



 

Additional Data

Additional product data on customer segments, deployment and implementation, user adoption, and market presence is displayed below.

Customer Segments Served

Google Classroom
Canvas
Blackboard
McGraw-Hill
Litmos
Schoology
Moodle
Brightspace
TalentLMS
Edmodo
Path LMS
Chamilo LMS
LatitudeLearning
Thought Industries
Edsby
Pearson
Engrade
WizIQ
Sakai
PowerSchool
Skyward
Moodlerooms
Infinite Campus
Average
Customers by Size
Small Business (50 or fewer emp.)28%20%24%18%15%33%27%23%53%28%81%53%56%50%33%9%42%67%31%33%24%21%10%33%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)47%30%29%31%58%42%42%23%27%51%6%27%36%33%62%36%50%22%27%58%48%50%70%39%
Enterprise ( >1000 emp.)25%50%47%51%27%25%31%55%20%22%13%20%9%17%5%55%8%11%41%8%29%29%20%26%
Google Classroom
Canvas
Blackboard
McGraw-Hill
Litmos
Schoology
Moodle
Brightspace
TalentLMS
Edmodo
Path LMS
Chamilo LMS
LatitudeLearning
Thought Industries
Edsby
Pearson
Engrade
WizIQ
Sakai
PowerSchool
Skyward
Moodlerooms
Infinite Campus
Deployment Method
Cloud
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
On-Premise
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

Implementation Time

Avg. Months to Go Live
0.3
3.7
2.3
1.9
1.8
1.6
2.5
3.5
1.8
0.3
1.3
0.4
3.3
2.1
3.8
n/a
n/a
2.6
2.8
n/a
n/a
1.6
n/a

Implementation Method

Led by In-House Team
100%
95%
77%
50%
92%
100%
88%
69%
100%
100%
82%
73%
93%
88%
78%
n/a
n/a
89%
60%
n/a
n/a
78%
n/a
Led by Vendor PS
0%
3%
23%
50%
3%
0%
13%
31%
0%
0%
18%
27%
0%
13%
11%
n/a
n/a
11%
20%
n/a
n/a
11%
n/a
Led by 3rd Party
0%
3%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
11%
n/a
n/a
0%
20%
n/a
n/a
11%
n/a

Number of Users Purchased

Median Number of Users Bought
125
750
6,875
275
375
n/a
175
10,000
75
20
375
7,500
56
7,500
375
n/a
n/a
37
1,750
n/a
n/a
750
n/a

Contract Term

Avg. Contract Term (Months)
5
16
29
3
14
n/a
7
12
5
0
22
0
3
22
15
n/a
n/a
14
24
n/a
n/a
17
n/a
Google Classroom
Canvas
Blackboard
McGraw-Hill
Litmos
Schoology
Moodle
Brightspace
TalentLMS
Edmodo
Path LMS
Chamilo LMS
LatitudeLearning
Thought Industries
Edsby
Pearson
Engrade
WizIQ
Sakai
PowerSchool
Skyward
Moodlerooms
Infinite Campus
Average
User Adoption
Average User Adoption
71%
73%
80%
89%
56%
82%
77%
75%
56%
58%
64%
86%
54%
75%
76%
n/a
n/a
37%
81%
n/a
n/a
46%
n/a
69%
Google Classroom
Canvas
Blackboard
McGraw-Hill
Litmos
Schoology
Moodle
Brightspace
TalentLMS
Edmodo
Path LMS
Chamilo LMS
LatitudeLearning
Thought Industries
Edsby
Pearson
Engrade
WizIQ
Sakai
PowerSchool
Skyward
Moodlerooms
Infinite Campus
Vendor Information
Vendor Name
Google
Instructure
Blackboard
McGraw-Hill Education
Callidus- Cloud
Schoology
Moodle
Desire2Learn
TalentLMS
Edmodo
Blue Sky eLearn
Chamilo Association
Latitude CG
Thought Industries
Edsby
Pearson
McGraw-Hill Education
WizIQ Inc.
Apereo Foundation
Power- School
Skyward Inc.
Blackboard
Infinite Campus
Year Founded
1998
2008
1997
1888
1996
2009
2001
1999
2003
2008
2002
2010
2003
2012
2010
n/a
1888
2007
2000
1997
1980
1997
1993
Revenue ($MM)
$90,272
n/a
n/a
n/a
$207
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$5,625
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Employees on LinkedIn (Vendor)
121,532
1,078
3,236
5,539
1,205
303
93
742
15
144
44
6
45
34
16
29,893
5,539
295
19
946
479
3,236
397
LinkedIn Followers
5,335,024
10,210
41,651
53,402
26,786
6,637
11,670
22,338
65
6,155
635
306
432
596
656
67,560
53,402
7,448
114
3,088
4,920
41,651
2,783
Twitter Followers (Vendor)
Klout Score (Vendor)
98
80
82
77
76
62
63
78
49
66
47
45
30
41
51
88
77
46
49
50
48
82
46
Glassdoor Rating
4.4
4.4
3.2
3.3
3.7
4.4
5.0
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.3
n/a
3.6
5.0
n/a
3.0
3.3
3.8
3.4
3.3
3.8
3.2
4.4
Alexa Web Traffic Rank
1
296
321
n/a
246,002
2,863
111,022
191,668
193,495
1,781
2,723,281
164,401
311,603
307,329
25,886
3,071
n/a
15,133
284,800
3,290
94,656
321
37,117
 

*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question or when data is not publicly available.



© 2017 G2 Crowd, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2 Crowd’s prior written permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 Crowd disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.