E-Commerce Platforms

Products shown on the Grid for E-Commerce Platform have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by May 11, 2015. Products are ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, vendor size, and social impact) and placed into four categories on the Grid:
  • Leaders offer e-commerce platform products that are rated highly by G2 Crowd users and have substantial scale, market share, and global support and service resources. Leaders products include: Shopify
  • High Performers provide products that are highly rated by their users, but have not yet achieved the market share and scale of the vendors in the Leader category. High Performers products include: Miva Merchant, Avangate, cleverbridge, Demandware, and Bigcommerce
  • Contenders have significant market presence and resources, but their products have received below average user satisfaction ratings or have not yet received a sufficient number of reviews to validate their products. Contenders products include: Magento, hybris, IBM WebSphere Commerce, NetSuite Commerce, Infusionsoft, and Oracle Commerce
  • Niche products do not have the market presence of the Leaders. They may have been rated positively on customer satisfaction, but have not yet received enough reviews to validate their success. Niche products include: Volusion

Grid℠ Scores for E-Commerce Platforms

The table below shows the satisfaction and market presence scores that determine vendor placement on the Grid℠. To learn more about each of the products, please see the executive profile section.

Leaders

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Shopify
25
93
53
73

High Performers

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Miva Merchant
43
97
38
67
Avangate
20
91
37
64
cleverbridge
15
86
34
60
Demandware
18
74
40
57
Bigcommerce
16
65
42
53

Contenders

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Magento
30
45
76
60
hybris
11
46
65
55
IBM WebSphere Commerce
15
36
62
49
NetSuite Commerce
12
38
51
44
Oracle Commerce
17
14
64
39
Infusionsoft
26
32
51
41

Niche

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Volusion
15
8
43
25

Grid℠ Methodology

E-Commerce Platforms Market Definition

E-Commerce platforms are designed to facilitate the sale of products and services online, including online retail, digital downloads, and other web purchases. These platforms often include shopping cart features, inventory management tools, online transaction processing, internet marketing, and other resources to help users build and maintain an online store. Additional features may include search tools, pricing management, promotion development, and targeted marketing. Included within the e-commerce platform category are digital e-commerce tools, which specialize exclusively in the sale of digital merchandise such as music or software downloads.

For information about additional e-commerce software, including catalogue management, shopping cart, payment gateway, and subscription management software, visit the E-Commerce Software category page.

Grid℠ Rating Methodology

The Grid℠ represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 Crowd rates e-commerce products algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 Crowd users and data aggregated from online sources and social networks.

Technology buyers can use the Grid℠ to help them quickly select the best e-commerce platform for their business and to find peers with similar experiences. For vendors, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid℠ provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.

Grid℠ Scoring Methodology

G2 Crowd rates products and vendors based on ratings and reviews gathered from our user community, as well as data aggregated from online sources and social networks. We apply a unique, patent-pending algorithm to this data to calculate the product strength and vendor market presence scores in real time.

The satisfaction rating is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Overall Customer Satisfaction and Net Promoter Score (NPS) based on ratings by G2 Crowd users
  • Customer satisfaction with second-level product attributes based on user reviews
  • Popularity and statistical significance based on number of ratings and reviews received by G2 Crowd

The market presence score is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Number of employees for product and parent company (based on social networks and public sources)
  • Market share based on share of voice including number of ratings and reviews received
  • Vendor momentum based on web traffic and Google search trends
  • Product social impact based on Klout score and Twitter followers
  • Vendor social impact based on Klout score, Twitter, and LinkedIn followers
  • Revenue and year over year revenue growth rate (if available)
  • Age of company (number of years in operation)
  • Employee satisfaction and engagement (based on social network ratings)

Rating Changes and Dynamics

The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and social data collected by G2 Crowd up through May 11, 2015. The ratings may change as the products are further developed, the vendors grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 Crowd updates the ratings on its website in real-time as additional data is received, and we will update this report at least twice per year. By improving their products and support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, contenders may become leaders and niche vendors may become high performers.

Trust

Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. We require the use of a LinkedIn account to validate a G2 Crowd user’s identity and employer and verify all reviews manually. We do not allow users to rate their employer’s products or those of their employer’s competitors. Though we share reviews from business partners (they often contain valuable content), we filter out business partner ratings in our aggregate ratings to avoid bias.

Our G2 Crowd staff does not add any subjective input to the ratings, which are determined algorithmically based on data aggregated from publicly available online sources and social networks. Vendors cannot influence their ratings by spending time or money with us. Only the opinion of real users and data from public sources factor into the ratings.

Grid℠ Inclusion Criteria

All products in a G2 Crowd category that have at least 10 reviews from real users of the product will be included in the Grid℠. Inviting other users, such as colleagues and peers to join G2 Crowd and share authentic product reviews will accelerate this process.

If an e-signature product is not yet listed on G2 Crowd and it fits the market definition above, then users are encouraged to suggest its addition to our E-Commerce Platform category.

Product Executive Summaries

Executive profiles and detailed charts are included for products with 10 or more reviews.
Shopify
Shopify
25
4.6 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Shopify
  • Location: Ottawa, ON
  • Founded: 2006
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 534
  • Website: http://www.shopify.com

Highest-Rated Features

Customer Service
90%
Average 77%
Performance and Reliability
90%
Average 86%
Content Management
89%
Average 82%

Lowest-Rated Features

Internationalization
67%
Average 77%
Test to Product Migration
69%
Average 78%
Recommendations/Personalization
71%
Average 73%

Executive Summary

Shopify has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 96% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 96% of users believe Shopify is headed in the right direction.

Shopify offered users faster storefront set-up times, users said, and its ease of use was the most commonly cited benefit of the e-commerce solution. Unlike a number of other e-commerce products, users found that Shopify stores could be set up with minimal coding experience and was relatively easy to operate. Reviewers liked Shopify’s templates, which, while more limited than open source solutions, were nonetheless powerful enough to allow web developers and designers to sufficiently customize their storefronts.

While reviewers generally preferred Shopify’s easy and standardized templates to more flexible alternatives, several were disappointed by the limited ability to customize checkout. One user also noted that there was no robust cart abandonment recapture, and that Shopify does not come with the ability to print labels or manage shipping items.

Like other e-commerce platforms, Shopify offers (and at times requires) third party add-ons in order to maximize its functionality. Some reviewers complained that many of the app store offerings are priced monthly, which can increase the cost of the program overall. These reviewers regretted that the functionality of these apps were not included in the default program. However, reviewers did like that the app-store is more controlled than other, open-source providers, and overall found Shopify’s pricing to be fair and affordable.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Miva Merchant
Miva Merchant
44
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Miva, Inc.
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Founded: 1997
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 68
  • Website: http://www.miva.com

Highest-Rated Features

Performance and Reliability
94%
Average 86%
Security
92%
Average 84%
User management
91%
Average 82%

Lowest-Rated Features

Product Reviews
68%
Average 67%
Abandoned Cart Tools
69%
Average 68%
Intangible Products
70%
Average 78%

Executive Summary

Miva Merchant has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. Miva Merchant received the highest Satisfaction score among e-commerce platform products. 93% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 88% of users believe Miva Merchant is headed in the right direction.

Many Miva Merchant reviewers were loyal customers who had been using the product for as many as fifteen years. These long-term users appreciated the product’s longevity and consistency, as well as its constant improvements and feature additions over time. Reviewers liked that Miva Merchant is highly flexible and customizable, although some complained about the difficulty of the product’s proprietary language; many recommended either having a highly technical team to manage implementation or to take advantage of Miva Merchant’s in-house developers. Miva’s high level of security for both customer and administrator data was another major advantage of the product.

In addition to a strong technical support team, which many Miva Merchant reviewers applauded, the product has a strong community of users and developers and an excellent user support forum. The community of third-party developers means that there is a large number of third-party modules and add-ons available, a major advantage for some users. One user noted that it could be difficult to determine the quality of these third-party applications, however, and some would have liked to see the features modified by them to be included as features within Miva Merchant’s base package.

The most common complaint about Miva Merchant was in regards to its pricing. While many users found that Miva Merchant was worth the price, many complained that the company nickled-and-dimed customers with added fees, including a cost to add additional administrator seats and high costs for developers. Miva Merchant’s recent upgrade also came with a price increase and left some customers paying additional fees for using older editions. However, users still noted that Miva is nonetheless an “exceptional value” and found that the recent upgrade offered new features and improvements that made it worth the cost.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Avangate
Avangate
20
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Avangate
  • Location: Redwood Shores, CA
  • Founded: 2006
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 168
  • Website: http://www.avangate.com/

Highest-Rated Features

B2B Features
98%
Average 76%
Multi Site Management
98%
Average 82%
Cross Browser Support
98%
Average 82%

Lowest-Rated Features

Store Front Design Tools
88%
Average 75%
Abandoned Cart Tools
91%
Average 68%
Promotions and Discounts
92%
Average 79%

Executive Summary

Avangate has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 95% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 84% of users believe Avangate is headed in the right direction.

Avangate offers a digital e-commerce solution for software sales that users described as cost effective and easy to use. Avangate’s value in selling software globally was one of the primary benefits mentioned by reviewers, who liked that it handles taxes and laws associated with selling software in foreign countries. The software also offers support for multiple currencies and language, making it a strong fit for those interested in selling their software globally. A quickly-evolving API, convenient reporting, and responsive support and implementation teams were among the other benefits cited by Avangate users.

While satisfaction ratings were overall high among Avangate users—reviewers gave Avangate a normalized satisfaction score of 91—reviewers had some complaints, including some payment problems and inflexibility in designing templates. Reviewers also found that Avangate can be limited in terms of its mobile options.

While Avangate users described it as more expensive than traditional e-commerce services, they overall agreed that the product was worth the extra cost. Overall reviewers recommended Avangate to potential buyers, giving it an NPS score of 80, the highest in the category.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

cleverbridge
cleverbridge
15
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: cleverbridge
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Founded: 2005
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 168
  • Website: http://www.cleverbridge.com

Highest-Rated Features

Cross Channel Fulfillment
93%
Average 78%
Order Management
92%
Average 84%
Security
92%
Average 84%

Lowest-Rated Features

Abandoned Cart Tools
73%
Average 68%
Unified Customer experience
76%
Average 78%
SEO
79%
Average 77%

Executive Summary

cleverbridge has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. cleverbridge has the smallest Market Presence among e-commerce platform products. 93% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 86% of users believe cleverbridge is headed in the right direction.

Cleverbridge earned glowing comments from its reviewers for its attitude towards its clients and its excellent support services. In addition to an account management team offering individual support to clients and a strong customer service model, reviewers applauded its clean interface, customizable cart design, and fast load times. Users described it as a turnkey solution, and liked that it has the option to track demographic, conversion, and revenue from various marketing campaigns. Cleverbridge users liked its clean API and appreciated that it was able to manage everything involved with the e-commerce process, including banking and task functions.

While the ability to customize the product’s shopping cart was a major advantage for reviewers, they found that doing so was a time-intensive process and could take about two weeks to complete. Reviewers also regretted that there was no mobile application to access their account and occasionally found that slow interaction between the front and back end of the site caused problems like duplicate orders or delays. Cost was also a factor for reviewers—some described Cleverbridge as expensive—but overall users were satisfied with the product, giving it an overall normalized satisfaction score of 86.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Demandware
Demandware
18
4.3 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Demandware (NYSE: DWRE)
  • Location: Burlington, MA
  • Founded: 2004
  • 2015 Revenue: $103.7 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 613
  • Website: http://www.demandware.com/

Highest-Rated Features

Performance and Reliability
88%
Average 86%
Admin Access Rights
87%
Average 84%
Promotions and Discounts
86%
Average 79%

Lowest-Rated Features

Abandoned Cart Tools
57%
Average 68%
Mobile
61%
Average 73%
Product Reviews
63%
Average 67%

Executive Summary

Demandware has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 94% of users believe Demandware is headed in the right direction.

Users of Demandware found it to be a customer-friendly e-commerce platform, with an easy to use interface and strong functionality. The pricing structure was a major advantage for some reviewers. Cost is based on revenue, which users cited as evidence of the company’s commitment to customer success. The ability to scale globally, custom site preferences, and the ability to target experiences and promotions to individual customers were among the other strengths Demandware users cited—Demandware received the second highest satisfaction score in promotions and discounts (85% as compared to a category average of 78%).

While Demandware received an above average ease of use score—83% compared to a category average of 80%—users found that certified Demandware training was essential to making the most out of the service. Because the product uses a proprietary language, internal workforce also had to be retrained in order to successfully optimize the system. Reviewers regretted that there was no content management system or custom database. However, in spite of it’s downfalls, Demandware’s overall satisfaction rating of 74 earned its place as a High Performer on the Summer 2015 Grid.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Bigcommerce
Bigcommerce
17
4.1 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Bigcommerce
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 383
  • Website: http://www.bigcommerce.com

Highest-Rated Features

Performance and Reliability
90%
Average 86%
Mobile
89%
Average 73%
Admin Access Rights
89%
Average 84%

Lowest-Rated Features

Integration with 3rd Party Stores
66%
Average 67%
Product Search and Filtering
73%
Average 77%
Recommendations/Personalization
75%
Average 73%

Executive Summary

Bigcommerce has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 81% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 88% of users believe Bigcommerce is headed in the right direction.

Bigcommerce users described the product as an excellent choice for new users to get up and running with minimal effort and cost. Reviewers liked the clean user interface, the strong basic design, and easy-to-use administrative tools and shopping cart. Bigcommerce offers excellent technical support services, as well as abundant support through in-house and freelance services, and users reported that the company valued their clients and wanted them to be able to set up their store quickly and effectively.

While the product’s ease of use was a primary advantage for most users, some found that it came at the cost of flexibility, and suggested that the software has some limitations. Others noted that using third party tools and providers could become very expensive, and found that the software’s live chat support was less effective for advanced users, as agents did not always understand the full functionality of the software. One user reported some technical glitches as well, but found that the benefits of the software outweighed its downsides.

Reviewers recommended understanding the limitations of the service and approaching the process with a strong sense of the company’s business priorities to ensure that BigCommerce would be the right choice. Overall, users were happy with the product, and its high satisfaction score secured its place as a High Performer in the G2 Crowd grid.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Magento
Magento
30
3.9 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: eBay (Public)
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Founded: 1995
  • 2015 Revenue: $16,047.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 34.7k
  • Website: http://www.ebayinc.com

Highest-Rated Features

Integrations to add on tools
83%
Average 77%
Cross Browser Support
83%
Average 82%
Customization
82%
Average 79%

Lowest-Rated Features

Product Reviews
61%
Average 67%
Reporting/Analytics
65%
Average 77%
Abandoned Cart Tools
67%
Average 68%

Executive Summary

Magento has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. Magento has the largest Market Presence among e-commerce platform products. 77% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 78% of users believe Magento is headed in the right direction.

Magento offers users a highly robust and customizable e-commerce solution built on an open source platform, according to reviews. Reviewers liked that the product has a strong user community and an excellent supply of third-party developers with Magento experience. These developers came in handy for reviewers, who typically agreed that the product requires development assistance during implementation. Reviewers recommended having at least one highly competent PHP/MySQL programmer on hand to help with the initial site setup, or to hire a dedicated and experienced Magento developer to help.

Once the product is implemented, however, a number of users found the admin dashboard intuitive and the product easier than other programs to optimize and maintain. Though many liked the backend interface, however, there were mixed reviews; others complained that the product could be very difficult to use and disliked the backend. Another complaint centered around performance problems. Some users found that the program runs slower than other offerings, and that it requires powerful hosting capabilities in order to handle traffic and achieve optimal speeds. Since the cost of Magento depends on server licenses, users who needed more servers to manage traffic found that the product became very costly.

Overall, reviewers found Magento to be a powerful option for SMBs, with plenty of room to scale. Beyond having talented developers to aid in initial set-up, users recommended taking a basic training course to learn how to get the most out of using Magento. While the number of features could be overwhelming or difficult for some users, overall the flexibility of the program was a major benefit and contributed to the product’s high satisfaction ratings.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

hybris
hybris
11
4.1 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: SAP (NYSE:SAP)
  • Location: Walldorf, Germany
  • Founded: 1972
  • 2014 Revenue: $18,857.9 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 68.8k
  • Website: http://www.sap.com

Highest-Rated Features

Order Management
93%
Average 84%
Internationalization
92%
Average 77%
Check Out Process
90%
Average 81%

Lowest-Rated Features

Product Reviews
60%
Average 67%
Abandoned Cart Tools
60%
Average 68%
Store Front Design Tools
65%
Average 75%

Executive Summary

hybris has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 91% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 86% of users believe hybris is headed in the right direction.

Hybris was a standout product in B2B e-commerce, according to reviewers, offering a flexible tool that was easy to install and implement. Because hybris is built on open source technologies, reviewers found that it was very easy to customize and offered a flexible framework for developers. Users liked that the product was able to manage large amounts of inventory efficiently and was able to effectively monitor online sales, and that it offered highly effective administrative tools.

While users mentioned that implementation was straightforward, some found that the interface could use improvement and disliked that online training was costly and only available for 30 days. Reviewers also noted that it could be difficult to hire talented resources that were trained in using hybris, and would have liked to see better documentation available. While hybris’ customizability was a major advantage for many reviewers, some noted that customization could be time consuming if done incorrectly.

In spite of some complaints, users were overall satisfied with their experience using hybris. Its order management and check-out process received particularly high satisfaction ratings.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

IBM WebSphere Commerce
IBM WebSphere Commerce
15
3.8 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: IBM (NYSE: IBM)
  • Location: Armonk, NY
  • Founded: 1911
  • 2013 Revenue: $99,751.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 404k
  • Website: http://www.ibm.com

Highest-Rated Features

Unified Customer experience
87%
Average 78%
Content Management
87%
Average 82%
Check Out Process
86%
Average 81%

Lowest-Rated Features

Mobile
74%
Average 73%
Social Commerce
74%
Average 70%
Product Reviews
77%
Average 67%

Executive Summary

IBM WebSphere Commerce has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 80% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 79% of users believe IBM WebSphere is headed in the right direction.

IBM WebSphere Commerce offers a powerful out-of-the-box e-commerce solution, according to reviewers, who liked that the product allows users to quickly and easily build an e-commerce site. Users noted that IBM WebSphere allowed them to create a better customer experience, and that it’s strong underlying structure made it easy to learn and effective in handling large transaction volumes. An intuitive management center, excellent catalog and promotion tabs, and flexibility of integrations were among the benefits highlighted by reviewers.

Although many reviewers praised IBM WebSphere for its power as an enterprise solution, some found that it could be clunky and slow with poor server load times. One reviewer remarked that some of the features were out-of-date or unnecessarily complex, while others complained about the high licensing costs. Users recommended training as a must, as the complex system could be overwhelming for new users.

Reviewers recommended that buyers considering the product think not only in terms of immediate needs, but in terms of your company’s long term goals. Doing so can help to determine whether an enterprise solution like IBM WebSphere would be a good fit.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

NetSuite Commerce
NetSuite Commerce
12
4.1 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: NetSuite (NYSE: N)
  • Location: San Mateo, CA
  • Founded: 1998
  • 2013 Revenue: $414.5 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 3.4k
  • Website: http://www.netsuite.com

Highest-Rated Features

Performance and Reliability
94%
Average 86%
Order Management
92%
Average 84%
Payment Processing
90%
Average 83%

Lowest-Rated Features

Integrations to add on tools
57%
Average 77%
Customization
67%
Average 79%
Check Out Process
69%
Average 81%

Executive Summary

NetSuite Commerce has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 88% of users believe NetSuite is headed in the right direction.

NetSuite Commerce users described the e-commerce solution as a comprehensive product that can do anything, with modules for accounting, CRM, inventory management, and more. Reviewers found that it was easy to upload files or transfer data between platforms and liked that there was real-time data available for inventory. They also noted that the platform is highly customizable, reliable, and user-friendly—users reported that it was very easy to train new users on how to use the back end software.

On the other hand, reviewers noted, training was essential for new users—reviewers repeatedly recommended taking the time to familiarize yourself with the system and suggested that it could take some time to master. Other complaints surrounding the product included occasional downtime and a lack of flexibility with other systems. Price was the most frequent complaint—users found NetSuite to be relatively expensive and cited regular price raises as making the product even more so in recent years.

That said, NetSuite nonetheless offered users a comprehensive and powerful e-commerce solution, with strong functionality, excellent reporting, and good customer service. Reviewers recommended that users take substantial care during implementation to ensure a high return from the product, and plan on additional investments along the line when scaling.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Oracle Commerce
Oracle Commerce
17
3.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Oracle (NYSE: ORCL)
  • Location: Redwood Shores, CA
  • Founded: 1977
  • 2014 Revenue: $38,275.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 137k
  • Website: http://www.oracle.com

Highest-Rated Features

B2B Features
78%
Average 76%
Customization
77%
Average 79%
Product Visualization
74%
Average 78%

Lowest-Rated Features

Mobile
54%
Average 73%
Integration with 3rd Party Stores
54%
Average 67%
Social Commerce
55%
Average 70%

Executive Summary

Oracle Commerce has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 71% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 67% of users believe Oracle Commerce is headed in the right direction.

Oracle Commerce is an enterprise-level e-commerce platform that users praised for its comprehensive and customizable functionality. Because Oracle Commerce is designed for large e-commerce sites, it is capable of handling large traffic loads and a high volume of transactions efficiently and securely. Reviewers liked that they were able to easily change the site experience without the assistance of programming staff, and that, though the backend could be daunting at first, it could be learned quickly compared to other solutions with the help of robust support services offered by the company.

While users liked that Oracle Commerce was powerful and robust, they were less satisfied with the product’s high price tag. One reviewer reported that the scale of the system meant occasional bugs and functional limitations, and another found that customization could cause trouble during updates and integrations. Lack of a CMS or connectivity to payment gateways, limited promotion options, and an outdated interface were other complaints surrounding the product.

Overall, however, reviewers were positive in their comments regarding the system and found it to be a highly functional and flexible tool. Reviewers recommended taking advantage of the large amount of documentation available to make the most out of the system. Because the product is highly robust and complex, they also recommended selecting an implementation team carefully and ensuring that your company has sufficient resources to maintain it effectively.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Infusionsoft
Infusionsoft
80
3.7 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Infusionsoft
  • Location: Gilbert, AZ
  • Founded: 2001
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 655
  • Website: http://www.infusionsoft.com

Highest-Rated Features

Security
90%
Average 84%
API's
88%
Average 79%
Test to Product Migration
88%
Average 78%

Lowest-Rated Features

Product Reviews
49%
Average 67%
Abandoned Cart Tools
51%
Average 68%
SEO
54%
Average 77%

Executive Summary

Infusionsoft has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 73% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 74% of users believe Infusionsoft is headed in the right direction.

User reviews for Infusionsoft were highly polarized; while some praised the marketing automation and e-commerce system as an all-in-one solution, managing customer information, email campaigns, product sales, and lead generation all in one place, others reported frustrating and disappointing experiences with the product. Complaints began with the expensive “Kick Starter” package, which was intended to get new users up and running on the program but was overpriced and insufficient for a number of reviewers. A steep learning curve, unhelpful documentation, and poor reporting and billing automation were among the complaints users expressed with the product.

Other complaints from reviewers included billing practices, including steering users towards highly-priced payment partners and an unwillingness to provide refunds, even after admitting errors on their part. These problems, among frustration with program features, contributed to the lowest ease of use score in the category, 68% compared to a category average of 80%.

Where Infusionsoft excelled for some was its ability to build complex marketing campaigns, its API flexibility, and its ability to eliminate a number of tasks. But e-commerce users overall were dissatisfied with their experience, and it received the lowest satisfaction score within the category.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Volusion
Volusion
15
3.2 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

  • Vendor: Volusion
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Founded: 1999
  • 2015 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn): 403
  • Website: http://www.volusion.com

Highest-Rated Features

Security
87%
Average 84%
SEO
86%
Average 77%
Admin Access Rights
86%
Average 84%

Lowest-Rated Features

Integration with 3rd Party Stores
37%
Average 67%
Mobile
44%
Average 73%
Social Commerce
45%
Average 70%

Executive Summary

Volusion has been named a Niche Vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. Volusion received the lowest Satisfaction score among e-commerce platform products. 60% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 53% of users believe Volusion is headed in the right direction.

Volusion reviewers described the program as an excellent starter e-commerce solution, with all of the functionality required to meet a company’s basic needs. While it offers fewer bells and whistles than other e-commerce tools, it nonetheless offers robust features and an easy-to-manage hosting platform with fast implementation times. Reviewers liked that there were a number of marketing and SEO options available, and found that the professional services team was useful in designing key landing pages. One reviewer highly recommended taking advantage of the professional services team early on to maximize the effectiveness of the design and SEO right from the beginning.

While reviewers felt that Volusion is a strong solution for newcomers, some suggested that more advanced users might outgrow the product. A lack of an a/b testing environment, fewer advanced features, and poor mobile responsiveness were among the limitations reviewers noted. They also mentioned that the shopping cart was better designed for B2C than for B2B. Finally, some reviewers mentioned that they would have liked to see better customer support, specifically a single account manager point of contact.

In spite of its limitations, reviewers recommended Volusion as a good option for the less tech- or marketing-savvy user.

Review Breakdown

Top Industries Represented

How do you position yourself against your competitors?

Response provided by: , at

Satisfaction Ratings

G2 Crowd users rated e-commerce software vendors' ability to satisfy their needs as shown in the table below.
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Satisfaction
Likely to Recommend
91%
89%
90%
89%
85%
82%
77%
81%
76%
81%
69%
70%
64%
80%
Product Going in Right Direction?
96%
88%
84%
86%
94%
88%
78%
86%
79%
88%
67%
74%
53%
81%

Satisfaction by Category

Meets Requirements
87%
89%
92%
88%
87%
83%
80%
86%
83%
79%
78%
81%
70%
83%
Ease of Admin
89%
88%
92%
87%
78%
85%
72%
n/a
71%
79%
69%
76%
82%
81%
Ease of Doing Business
89%
92%
90%
91%
84%
82%
79%
n/a
74%
79%
75%
84%
75%
83%
Quality of Support
86%
92%
88%
95%
87%
84%
69%
80%
78%
68%
64%
80%
79%
81%
Ease of Setup
94%
84%
89%
86%
76%
81%
61%
n/a
67%
62%
64%
65%
75%
75%
Ease of Use
93%
85%
94%
89%
83%
82%
71%
76%
77%
77%
73%
68%
70%
80%
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Net Promoter Score (NPS) (Range from -100 to +100)
64
70
80
53
50
38
13
27
-7
42
-12
38
-13
34

Feature Comparison

G2 Crowd users have evaluated e-commerce platforms by feature. Feature ratings are representative of reviewers' overall satisfaction with each feature and do not necessarily take into account the breadth of individual product features. The results are shown below.
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Merchandising/Marketing
Store Front Design Tools
86%
82%
88%
81%
77%
77%
73%
65%
79%
n/a
67%
66%
58%
75%
Product Visualization
84%
83%
94%
84%
73%
83%
78%
69%
77%
n/a
74%
69%
64%
78%
Recommendations/Personalization
71%
80%
92%
83%
69%
75%
69%
71%
80%
n/a
71%
58%
58%
73%
Promotions and Discounts
77%
78%
92%
86%
86%
81%
73%
76%
84%
n/a
67%
75%
70%
79%
Abandoned Cart Tools
75%
69%
91%
73%
57%
86%
67%
60%
77%
n/a
61%
51%
52%
68%
Product Reviews
73%
68%
63%
84%
61%
60%
77%
n/a
67%
49%
67%
67%
SEO
82%
79%
n/a
79%
78%
87%
73%
78%
80%
n/a
71%
54%
86%
77%
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Product Catalog
Content Management
89%
89%
94%
87%
77%
89%
76%
82%
87%
77%
69%
74%
73%
82%
Configured Products
86%
89%
87%
84%
81%
81%
82%
82%
n/a
70%
76%
74%
81%
Product Search and Filtering
82%
80%
94%
79%
73%
68%
86%
77%
n/a
74%
66%
60%
76%
Intangible Products
81%
70%
94%
79%
67%
88%
79%
83%
78%
n/a
64%
70%
n/a
78%
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Order Process
Check Out Process
83%
86%
95%
89%
70%
89%
76%
90%
86%
69%
60%
76%
80%
81%
Shipping Options
84%
87%
95%
84%
75%
86%
76%
86%
86%
80%
73%
64%
76%
81%
Tax Display and Processing
80%
86%
95%
81%
74%
86%
74%
n/a
82%
86%
68%
71%
78%
80%
Payment Processing
82%
91%
95%
90%
75%
83%
74%
89%
82%
90%
68%
78%
81%
83%
Order Management
88%
83%
96%
92%
75%
89%
77%
93%
82%
92%
70%
76%
78%
84%
Returns/Refunds
83%
88%
96%
84%
78%
88%
76%
n/a
82%
89%
59%
69%
60%
79%
Inventory Management
84%
78%
96%
79%
82%
75%
83%
82%
83%
68%
57%
57%
77%
Cross Channel Fulfillment
87%
77%
97%
93%
n/a
78%
75%
n/a
82%
n/a
70%
70%
51%
78%
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Multi-Channel Support
Unified Customer experience
83%
85%
94%
76%
64%
86%
71%
83%
87%
n/a
66%
79%
57%
78%
Mobile
86%
84%
93%
n/a
61%
89%
71%
n/a
74%
n/a
54%
71%
44%
73%
Social Commerce
82%
79%
n/a
63%
84%
71%
80%
74%
n/a
55%
63%
45%
70%
Customer Service
90%
83%
95%
85%
67%
78%
71%
80%
80%
n/a
63%
75%
60%
77%
Store Locator
82%
76%
70%
n/a
69%
n/a
86%
n/a
60%
66%
n/a
73%
Integration with 3rd Party Stores
76%
71%
n/a
76%
66%
73%
n/a
80%
n/a
54%
73%
37%
67%
B2B Features
79%
79%
98%
n/a
n/a
75%
86%
78%
n/a
78%
83%
49%
78%
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Platform
API's
89%
80%
94%
80%
70%
81%
82%
86%
82%
n/a
69%
88%
48%
79%
Customization
87%
88%
95%
79%
84%
75%
82%
82%
80%
67%
77%
82%
55%
79%
Integrations to add on tools
85%
86%
95%
81%
78%
79%
83%
81%
78%
57%
70%
81%
48%
77%
User management
89%
91%
92%
86%
81%
89%
81%
82%
80%
77%
66%
76%
79%
82%
Reporting/Analytics
89%
81%
94%
90%
75%
80%
65%
74%
77%
77%
62%
69%
68%
77%
Security
86%
92%
94%
92%
86%
80%
76%
82%
80%
86%
68%
90%
87%
84%
Multi Site Management
73%
98%
90%
84%
77%
81%
81%
n/a
70%
87%
n/a
82%
Admin Access Rights
86%
88%
97%
87%
87%
89%
81%
84%
79%
n/a
69%
82%
86%
84%
Test to Product Migration
69%
81%
95%
79%
86%
73%
76%
81%
n/a
68%
88%
54%
77%
Internationalization
67%
72%
95%
86%
86%
68%
92%
82%
n/a
60%
79%
51%
76%
Cross Browser Support
89%
87%
98%
91%
85%
81%
83%
80%
81%
n/a
65%
64%
81%
82%
Performance and Reliability
90%
94%
96%
90%
88%
90%
78%
80%
80%
94%
67%
80%
86%
86%

Customer Segments Served

E-commerce products serve a range of small, mid-market, and enterprise customers. The table below shows the breakdown by reviewers' company size.
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
Customers by Size
Small Business (50 or fewer emp.) 63% 90% 40% 27% 7% 70% 48% 0% 0% 45% 21% 96% 77% 44%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) 26% 10% 40% 64% 21% 30% 48% 20% 25% 45% 64% 0% 15% 31%
Enterprise ( >1000 emp.) 11% 0% 20% 9% 71% 0% 4% 80% 75% 9% 14% 4% 8% 23%

Deployment and Implementation

Deployment and implementation data for e-commerce products is shown below.
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Deployment Method
Cloud
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
78%
75%
40%
0%
100%
100%
100%
82%
On-Premise
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22%
25%
60%
100%
0%
0%
0%
18%

Implementation Time

Avg. Months to Go Live
0.9
1.5
3.3
2.8
6.2
1.9
4.9
n/a
7.8
n/a
8.1
1.0
1.8

Implementation Method

Led by In-House Team
92%
69%
67%
75%
0%
75%
53%
50%
40%
50%
13%
75%
91%
Led by Vendor PS
0%
7%
33%
25%
0%
0%
11%
0%
20%
25%
13%
8%
0%
Led by 3rd Party
8%
24%
0%
0%
100%
25%
37%
50%
40%
25%
75%
17%
9%

Number of Users Purchased

Median Number of Users Bought
3
3
12
394
n/a
3
3
n/a
n/a
n/a
175
5
3

Contract Term

Avg. Contract Term (Months)
4
3
12
8
n/a
1
7
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2
3
*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question.

User Adoption and ROI

G2 Crowd reviewers shared their average adoption levels and return on investment in the table below.
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Average
User Adoption
Average User Adoption
61%
93%
81%
86%
91%
69%
72%
n/a
56%
n/a
63%
89%
98%
78
Avg. Payback Period (Months)
4
6
n/a
n/a
n/a
5
17
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
6
6
7

Vendor Market Presence

Key data on each vendor’s overall scale and market presence is shown below.
Shopify
Miva Merchant
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
Magento
hybris
IBM WebSphere
NetSuite
Oracle Commerce
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Vendor Information
Vendor Name
Shopify
Miva, Inc.
Avangate
cleverbridge
Demandware
Bigcommerce
eBay
SAP
IBM
NetSuite
Oracle
Infusionsoft
Volusion
Year Founded
2006
1997
2006
2005
2004
2009
1995
1972
1911
1998
1977
2001
1999
Revenue ($MM)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$104
n/a
$16,047
$18,858
$99,751
$415
$38,275
n/a
n/a
Employees on LinkedIn (Vendor)
534
68
168
168
613
383
34,654
68,798
403,847
3,395
137,115
655
403
LinkedIn Followers
16,205
497
2,595
1,219
10,555
9,153
178,981
589,504
2,363,266
67,155
1,447,890
9,327
4,807
Twitter Followers
Klout Score
83.0
49.0
54.0
47.0
55.0
65.0
94.0
89.0
n/a
82.0
87.0
70.0
64.0
Alexa Web Traffic Rank
584
95,971
4,770
11,578
40,318
3,561
26,760
2,224
763
2,251
415
397
8,493

© 2015 G2 Crowd, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2 Crowd’s prior written permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 Crowd disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.