Social Media Management Software

 
for Social Media Management
G2 watermark
Grid℠ Scoring
Contenders
Leaders
High Performers
Niche
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Presence
Satisfaction
Sort by:
# of Ratings
Satisfaction
Market Presence
G2 Score
 

Social Media Management Software Definition

Social media management systems provide functionality to administer social media accounts, schedule posts, suggest content, and boost posts. Social media management software is used by social media, marketing, and communications departments to increase brand awareness, manage workflows, and engage online communities. Social media management tools are used by these teams to create engaging content that can be used in marketing campaigns and to maintain an online presence. The products often provide tools such as user access control, content libraries, timelines, schedules, and archives. Social media management tools are aimed at optimizing search engine optimization, increasing inbound traffic, customer satisfaction, and customer conversion. Social media management software often provides functionality of social media monitoring and social analytics software. It can be a part of a social media suite as a standalone or integrated component. Many marketing automation products offer social media management as a feature.

    To qualify as a social media management system, a product must:
  • Plan social media content
  • Publish social media posts
  • Manage multiple accounts
  • Respond to inquiries
  • Automate and schedule social media posts
  • Store content and archive posts

Social Media Management Grid℠ Description

Products shown on the Grid for Social Media Management have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by July 01, 2016. Products are ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, vendor size, and social impact) and placed into four categories on the Grid:

New Products on Grid℠

Products appearing on the Social Media Management Grid℠ for the first time are Salesforce.com Social Studio, Talkwalker, Socialbakers, Crowdfire, Shortstack, Edgar, Tracx, ManageFlitter, Sysomos Expion, Audiense.

Products Not Yet on Grid℠

Products with fewer than 10 reviews are not included on the Grid℠. Some notable products not yet included are SDL SM2, Attensity, and Tailwind. Users of these products are encouraged to visit the Social Media Management category and write a review.



 

Grid℠ Scores for Social Media Management

 
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine vendor placement on the Grid℠. To learn more about each of the products, please see the executive profile section.

Leaders

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Facebook Pages Manager
93
82
97
89
TweetDeck
103
88
84
86
Hootsuite
253
94
76
85
Sprout Social
191
98
64
81
Buffer
107
98
52
75
Social Studio
161
61
90
75

High Performers

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
AgoraPulse
243
98
46
72
Sendible
130
95
49
72
Talkwalker
29
64
38
51
GroSocial
14
57
41
49
Falcon.io
25
51
40
45
MavSocial
21
62
26
44
Oktopost
35
60
28
44
Shortstack
10
52
22
37

Contenders

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Zoho Social
14
27
63
45
Sprinklr
46
22
58
40

Niche

# of Reviews Satisfaction (normalized) Market Presence G2 Score
Cision Social Media Edition
20
48
48
48
Spredfast
37
35
48
41
Crowdfire
10
33
36
34
Edgar
10
43
23
33
Gremln
16
42
25
33
Tracx
15
34
30
32
Shoutlet
17
23
39
31
ManageFlitter
11
33
28
30
Sysomos Expion
12
25
36
30
Audiense
19
32
26
29
Socialbakers
14
6
45
25

 

Grid℠ Methodology

 

Grid℠ Rating Methodology

The Grid℠ represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 Crowd rates social media management products algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 Crowd users and data aggregated from online sources and social networks.

Technology buyers can use the Grid℠ to help them quickly select the best social media management product for their business and to find peers with similar experiences. For vendors, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid℠ provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.

Grid℠ Scoring Methodology

G2 Crowd rates products and vendors based on ratings and reviews gathered from our user community, as well as data aggregated from online sources and social networks. We apply a unique, patent-pending algorithm to this data to calculate the product strength and scores in real time. The Summer 2016 Social Media Management Grid℠ is based off of scores calculated using the G2 Crowd algorithm v1.1 from reviews collected through July 1, 2016. To view the Social Media Management Grid℠ with the most recent data, please visit the social media management category page.

The Satisfaction rating is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Overall customer satisfaction and Net Promoter Score® (NPS) based on ratings by G2 Crowd users
  • Customer satisfaction with second-level product attributes based on user reviews
  • Popularity and statistical significance based on number of ratings and reviews received by G2 Crowd

The Market Presence score is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Number of employees for product and parent company (based on social networks and public sources)
  • Market share based on share of voice including number of ratings and reviews received
  • Vendor momentum based on web traffic and search trends
  • Product social impact based on Klout score and Twitter followers
  • Vendor social impact based on Klout score, and Twitter and LinkedIn followers
  • Revenue and year-over-year revenue growth rate (if available)
  • Age of company (number of years in operation)
  • Employee satisfaction and engagement (based on social network ratings)

Grid℠ Categorization Methodology

Making G2 Crowd research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.

To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 Crowd follows a publicly available categorization methodology. All social media management products appearing on the Grid℠ have passed through G2 Crowd's categorization methodology and meet G2 Crowd's category standards.

Many terms that appear regularly across G2 Crowd and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding. These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid℠. A list of standard definitions is available to G2 Crowd users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.

Rating Changes and Dynamics

The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and social data collected by G2 Crowd up through July 1, 2016. The ratings may change as the products are further developed, the vendors grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 Crowd updates the ratings on its website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche vendors may become High Performers.

Trust

Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. We require the use of a LinkedIn account to validate a G2 Crowd user’s identity and employer. Additionally, we verify all reviews manually. We do not allow users to rate their employer’s products or those of their employer’s competitors. Though we share reviews from business partners (they often contain valuable content), we filter out business partner ratings in our aggregate ratings to avoid bias.

Our G2 Crowd staff does not add any subjective input to the ratings, which are determined algorithmically based on data aggregated from publicly available online sources and social networks. Vendors cannot influence their ratings by spending time or money with us. Only the opinion of real users and data from public sources factor into the ratings.

Grid℠ Inclusion Criteria

All products in a G2 Crowd category that have at least 10 reviews from real users of the product will be included on the Grid℠. Inviting other users, such as colleagues and peers, to join G2 Crowd and share authentic product reviews will accelerate this process.

If a social media management product is not yet listed on G2 Crowd and it fits the market definition above, then users are encouraged to suggest its addition to our Social Media Management category.

Product Profiles

Product profiles and detailed charts are included for products with 10 or more reviews.
 

*Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix Systems, Inc.


 
Facebook Pages Manager
Facebook Pages Manager
93 ratings
3.9 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Facebook (NASDAQ: FB)
  • Location: Menlo Park, CA
  • Founded: 2004
  • 2015 Revenue: $17,928.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 16.4k
  • Website: www.facebook.com

Product Synopsis

 

Facebook Pages Manager has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. Facebook has the largest Market Presence among social media management products. 78% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 69% of users believe Facebook is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
68%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
79%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
83%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
81%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
89%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
TweetDeck
TweetDeck
103 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Twitter (NYSE: TWTR)
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 2006
  • 2015 Revenue: $2,218.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 4.06k
  • Website: about.twitter.com

Product Synopsis

 

TweetDeck has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 83% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 66% of users believe TweetDeck is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
79%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
89%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
85%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
91%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
86%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
89%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Hootsuite
Hootsuite
253 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Hootsuite
  • Location: British Columbia, Canada
  • Founded: 2008
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.21k
  • Website: www.hootsuite.com

Product Synopsis

 

Hootsuite has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 88% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 82% of users believe Hootsuite is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
82%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
85%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
86%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
84%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
86%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Sprout Social
Sprout Social
191 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Sprout Social
  • Location: Chicago, IL
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 221
  • Website: sproutsocial.com

Product Synopsis

 

Sprout Social has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 96% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 93% of users believe Sprout is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
93%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
93%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
85%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
91%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
93%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
93%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Buffer
Buffer
107 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Buffer
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 105
  • Website: buffer.com

Product Synopsis

 

Buffer has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 95% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 89% of users believe Buffer is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
85%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
93%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
91%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
88%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
94%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Social Studio
Social Studio
161 ratings
3.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Salesforce (NYSE: CRM)
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 1999
  • 2016 Revenue: $6,667.2 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 21.3k
  • Website: www.salesforce.com

Product Synopsis

 

Social Studio has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 68% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 79% of users believe Social Studio is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
76%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
78%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
71%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
81%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
78%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
77%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
AgoraPulse
AgoraPulse
243 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: AgoraPulse
  • Location: Paris, France
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 17
  • Website: agorapulse.com

Product Synopsis

 

AgoraPulse has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. AgoraPulse received the highest Satisfaction score among social media management products. 99% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 96% of users believe AgoraPulse is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
95%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
93%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
92%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
93%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
95%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Sendible
Sendible
130 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Sendible
  • Location: London, United Kingdom
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 24
  • Website: sendible.com

Product Synopsis

 

Sendible has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 93% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 91% of users believe Sendible is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
87%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
85%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
84%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
84%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
89%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
83%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Talkwalker
Talkwalker
29 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Talkwalker
  • Location: Aldringen, Luxembourg
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 91
  • Website: talkwalker.com

Product Synopsis

 

Talkwalker has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 97% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 88% of users believe Talkwalker is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
93%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
89%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
88%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
88%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
89%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
GroSocial
GroSocial
14 ratings
4.7 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Infusionsoft
  • Location: Chandler, AZ
  • Founded: 2001
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 674
  • Website: www.infusionsoft.com

Product Synopsis

 

GroSocial has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 93% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 88% of users believe GroSocial is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
96%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
96%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
93%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
95%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
95%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
91%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Falcon.io
Falcon.io
25 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Falcon Social
  • Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 258
  • Website: www.falcon.io

Product Synopsis

 

Falcon.io has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 88% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 88% of users believe Falcon.io is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
93%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
85%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
79%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
88%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
90%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
89%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
MavSocial
MavSocial
21 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Maventus Group
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 2012
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 25
  • Website: mavsocial.com

Product Synopsis

 

MavSocial has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 95% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 95% of users believe MavSocial is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
96%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
85%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
91%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
95%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
89%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Oktopost
Oktopost
35 ratings
4.4 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Oktopost
  • Location: Ramat Gan, Israel
  • Founded: 2013
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 12
  • Website: www.oktopost.com

Product Synopsis

 

Oktopost has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 91% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 97% of users believe Oktopost is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
92%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
89%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
84%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
89%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
95%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
86%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Shortstack
Shortstack
10 ratings
4.7 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Pancake Laboratories, Inc.
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 18
  • Website: www.shortstack.com

Product Synopsis

 

Shortstack has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 90% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 100% of users believe Shortstack is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
94%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
73%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
94%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
80%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
90%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
76%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Zoho Social
Zoho Social
14 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Zoho
  • Location: Pleasanton, CA
  • Founded: 1996
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 3.31k
  • Website: www.zoho.com

Product Synopsis

 

Zoho Social has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 79% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 93% of users believe Zoho Social is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
79%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
93%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
78%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
95%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
81%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
97%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Sprinklr
Sprinklr
46 ratings
3.6 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Sprinklr
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.28k
  • Website: www.sprinklr.com

Product Synopsis

 

Sprinklr has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a large market presence. 78% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 71% of users believe Sprinklr is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
80%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
73%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
75%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
76%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
83%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
70%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Cision Social Media Edition
Cision Social Media Edition
20 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Cision
  • Location: Chicago, IL
  • Founded: 1892
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.56k
  • Website: www.cision.com

Product Synopsis

 

Cision Social Media Edition has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 95% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 89% of users believe Cision is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
98%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
95%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
89%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
89%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
94%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
84%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Spredfast
Spredfast
37 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Spredfast
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Founded: 2008
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 493
  • Website: www.spredfast.com

Product Synopsis

 

Spredfast has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 85% of users believe Spredfast is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
86%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
76%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
83%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
84%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
92%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
83%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Crowdfire
Crowdfire
10 ratings
4.4 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Crowdfire
  • Location: Mumbai, India
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 47
  • Website: www.crowdfireapp.com

Product Synopsis

 

Crowdfire has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 88% of users believe Crowdfire is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
83%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Edgar
Edgar
10 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Edgar
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Founded: 2014
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 11
  • Website: www.meetedgar.com

Product Synopsis

 

Edgar has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 90% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 100% of users believe Edgar is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
91%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
90%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
94%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
97%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
86%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Gremln
Gremln
16 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Gremln
  • Location: St. Louis, MO
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 15
  • Website: www.gremln.com

Product Synopsis

 

Gremln has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 94% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 80% of users believe Gremln is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
94%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
92%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
94%
Average 88%
 
Not enough data available
 
Ease of Setup
100%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Tracx
Tracx
15 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Tracx
  • Location: Bethesda, Maryland
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 88
  • Website: www.tracx.com

Product Synopsis

 

Tracx has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 87% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 86% of users believe Tracx is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
92%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
84%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
78%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
95%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
81%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Shoutlet
Shoutlet
17 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Spredfast
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Founded: 2008
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 493
  • Website: www.spredfast.com

Product Synopsis

 

Shoutlet has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 88% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 79% of users believe Shoutlet is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
88%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
84%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
85%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
93%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
98%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
89%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
ManageFlitter
ManageFlitter
11 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: ManageFlitter
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 10
  • Website: manageflitter.com

Product Synopsis

 

ManageFlitter has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 91% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 80% of users believe ManageFlitter is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
84%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
90%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
90%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Sysomos Expion
Sysomos Expion
12 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Sysomos
  • Location: Ontario, Canada
  • Founded: 2007
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 274
  • Website: www.sysomos.com

Product Synopsis

 

Sysomos Expion has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 83% of users believe Sysomos Expion is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
90%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
76%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
80%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
88%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
94%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
86%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Audiense
Audiense
19 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Audiense
  • Location: London, United Kingdom
  • Founded: 2011
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 9
  • Website: www.audiense.com

Product Synopsis

 

Audiense has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 95% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 89% of users believe Audiense is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
91%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
87%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
84%
Average 84%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 
Socialbakers
Socialbakers
14 ratings
3.6 out of 5 stars

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Socialbakers
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 2008
  • 2016 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 402
  • Website: www.socialbakers.com

Product Synopsis

 

Socialbakers has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer satisfaction score and having a small market presence. 64% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars and 85% of users believe Socialbakers is headed in the right direction.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
76%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
88%
Average 86%
 
Meets Requirements
79%
Average 84%
 
Ease of Admin
90%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
80%
Average 90%
 
Ease of Setup
96%
Average 87%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 
 

Satisfaction Ratings

 
G2 Crowd users rated social media management software vendors' ability to satisfy their needs as shown in the table below.
Facebook
TweetDeck
Hootsuite
Sprout
Buffer
Social Studio
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
GroSocial
Falcon.io
MavSocial
Oktopost
Shortstack
Zoho Social
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Shoutlet
ManageFlitter
Sysomos Expion
Audiense
Socialbakers
Average
Satisfaction
Likely to Recommend
78%
81%
83%
89%
90%
69%
91%
85%
90%
94%
86%
93%
87%
94%
82%
72%
91%
82%
88%
89%
85%
86%
84%
89%
84%
83%
73%
85%
Product Going in Right Direction?
69%
66%
82%
93%
89%
79%
96%
91%
88%
88%
88%
95%
97%
100%
93%
71%
89%
85%
88%
100%
80%
86%
79%
80%
83%
89%
85%
86%

Satisfaction by Category

Meets Requirements
79%
85%
85%
85%
86%
71%
87%
84%
86%
93%
79%
86%
84%
94%
78%
75%
89%
83%
87%
90%
87%
86%
85%
90%
80%
84%
79%
84%
Ease of Admin
83%
91%
86%
91%
91%
81%
92%
84%
88%
95%
88%
91%
89%
80%
95%
76%
89%
84%
n/a
94%
94%
78%
93%
n/a
88%
n/a
90%
88%
Ease of Doing Business
81%
86%
84%
93%
88%
78%
93%
89%
88%
95%
90%
95%
95%
90%
81%
83%
94%
92%
n/a
97%
n/a
95%
98%
n/a
94%
n/a
80%
90%
Quality of Support
68%
79%
82%
93%
85%
76%
95%
87%
93%
96%
93%
96%
92%
94%
79%
80%
98%
86%
83%
91%
94%
92%
88%
84%
90%
91%
76%
88%
Ease of Setup
89%
89%
86%
93%
94%
77%
95%
83%
89%
91%
89%
89%
86%
76%
97%
70%
84%
83%
n/a
86%
100%
81%
89%
n/a
86%
n/a
96%
87%
Ease of Use
86%
89%
86%
93%
93%
78%
93%
85%
89%
96%
85%
85%
89%
73%
93%
73%
95%
76%
86%
86%
92%
84%
84%
90%
76%
87%
88%
86%
Facebook
TweetDeck
Hootsuite
Sprout
Buffer
Social Studio
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
GroSocial
Falcon.io
MavSocial
Oktopost
Shortstack
Zoho Social
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Shoutlet
ManageFlitter
Sysomos Expion
Audiense
Socialbakers
Average
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Net Promoter Score (NPS) (Range from -100 to +100)
17
29
40
63
64
-9
72
47
72
79
60
81
57
80
36
9
80
32
60
60
44
47
53
55
50
37
7
49
*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question.

 

Feature Comparison

 
G2 Crowd users have evaluated social media management software products by feature. Feature ratings are representative of reviewers' overall satisfaction with each feature and do not necessarily take into account the breadth of individual product features. The results are shown below.
Facebook
TweetDeck
Hootsuite
Sprout
Buffer
Social Studio
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
GroSocial
Falcon.io
MavSocial
Oktopost
Shortstack
Zoho Social
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Shoutlet
ManageFlitter
Sysomos Expion
Audiense
Socialbakers
Average
Social Marketing
Social Sharing
88%
90%
91%
92%
95%
75%
88%
91%
n/a
86%
88%
91%
92%
95%
87%
81%
96%
88%
84%
94%
89%
86%
90%
88%
79%
92%
n/a
89%
Social Campaigns
84%
82%
86%
84%
82%
73%
89%
86%
n/a
95%
84%
91%
92%
98%
85%
83%
94%
85%
80%
83%
89%
89%
89%
88%
77%
82%
n/a
86%
Social Engagement
86%
88%
87%
89%
84%
78%
90%
84%
n/a
91%
88%
88%
84%
97%
86%
84%
98%
88%
83%
69%
92%
88%
89%
94%
87%
91%
n/a
87%
Social Ads
81%
74%
71%
65%
59%
69%
n/a
n/a
n/a
57%
n/a
73%
64%
n/a
n/a
77%
n/a
n/a
n/a
71%
n/a
69%
Social Analytics
80%
69%
76%
87%
80%
71%
91%
76%
n/a
83%
84%
82%
80%
86%
80%
79%
88%
84%
83%
76%
89%
86%
86%
87%
81%
95%
n/a
82%

*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question.

**A gray box indicates that a vendor has selected that they do not offer that feature.


 

Additional Data

Additional product data on customer segments, deployment and implementation, user adoption and ROI, and market presence is displayed below.

Customer Segments Served

Facebook
TweetDeck
Hootsuite
Sprout
Buffer
Social Studio
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
GroSocial
Falcon.io
MavSocial
Oktopost
Shortstack
Zoho Social
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Shoutlet
ManageFlitter
Sysomos Expion
Audiense
Socialbakers
Average
Customers by Size
Small Business (50 or fewer emp.) 65% 44% 53% 54% 61% 27% 74% 76% 57% 40% 20% 84% 45% 60% 86% 13% 41% 22% 70% 100% 21% 31% 15% 73% 8% 47% 36% 49%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) 16% 34% 30% 36% 27% 35% 19% 18% 27% 40% 44% 11% 39% 30% 14% 41% 24% 35% 20% 0% 50% 62% 46% 18% 25% 41% 7% 29%
Enterprise ( >1000 emp.) 19% 22% 16% 10% 11% 39% 7% 5% 17% 20% 36% 5% 15% 10% 0% 46% 35% 43% 10% 0% 29% 8% 38% 9% 67% 12% 57% 21%
Facebook
TweetDeck
Hootsuite
Sprout
Buffer
Social Studio
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
GroSocial
Falcon.io
MavSocial
Oktopost
Shortstack
Zoho Social
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Shoutlet
ManageFlitter
Sysomos Expion
Audiense
Socialbakers
Deployment Method
Cloud
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
100%
100%
100%
100%
n/a
n/a
100%
100%
100%
n/a
80%
100%
71%
On-Premise
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
n/a
n/a
0%
0%
0%
n/a
20%
0%
29%

Implementation Time

Avg. Months to Go Live
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.6
0.6
0.4
n/a
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
1.2
0.0
0.8
n/a
n/a
0.2
0.3
1.1
n/a
1.1
n/a
0.8

Implementation Method

Led by In-House Team
97%
93%
94%
97%
100%
76%
96%
93%
89%
n/a
90%
100%
100%
100%
75%
78%
100%
79%
n/a
n/a
n/a
100%
50%
n/a
83%
n/a
80%
Led by Vendor PS
3%
7%
6%
3%
0%
18%
4%
5%
11%
n/a
10%
0%
0%
0%
13%
22%
0%
21%
n/a
n/a
n/a
0%
33%
n/a
17%
n/a
20%
Led by 3rd Party
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
2%
0%
n/a
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
n/a
n/a
n/a
0%
17%
n/a
0%
n/a
0%

Number of Users Purchased

Median Number of Users Bought
3
3
3
3
3
7
3
3
3
n/a
7
3
3
3
3
17
3
17
n/a
n/a
5
7
7
n/a
n/a
n/a
3

Contract Term

Avg. Contract Term (Months)
2
1
2
4
2
16
3
4
9
n/a
13
1
3
1
2
14
7
15
n/a
n/a
22
n/a
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Facebook
TweetDeck
Hootsuite
Sprout
Buffer
Social Studio
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
GroSocial
Falcon.io
MavSocial
Oktopost
Shortstack
Zoho Social
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Shoutlet
ManageFlitter
Sysomos Expion
Audiense
Socialbakers
Average
User Adoption
Average User Adoption
86%
78%
70%
73%
73%
56%
74%
71%
60%
n/a
60%
97%
71%
84%
63%
78%
90%
78%
n/a
n/a
n/a
63%
89%
n/a
74%
n/a
n/a
74
Avg. Payback Period (Months)
6
6
5
7
4
19
5
6
5
n/a
11
3
9
n/a
n/a
10
3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
7
Facebook
TweetDeck
Hootsuite
Sprout
Buffer
Social Studio
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
GroSocial
Falcon.io
MavSocial
Oktopost
Shortstack
Zoho Social
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Shoutlet
ManageFlitter
Sysomos Expion
Audiense
Socialbakers
Vendor Information
Vendor Name
Facebook
Twitter
Hootsuite
Sprout Social
Buffer
Salesforce
AgoraPulse
Sendible
Talkwalker
Infusionsoft
Falcon Social
Maventus Group
Oktopost
Pancake Laboratories, Inc.
Zoho
Sprinklr
Cision
Spredfast
Crowdfire
Edgar
Gremln
Tracx
Spredfast
ManageFlitter
Sysomos
Audiense
Socialbakers
Year Founded
2004
2006
2008
2010
2010
1999
2010
2009
2009
2001
2010
2012
2013
2009
1996
2009
1892
2008
2010
2014
2009
2009
2008
2010
2007
2011
2008
Revenue ($MM)
$17,928
$2,218
n/a
n/a
n/a
$6,667
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Employees on LinkedIn (Vendor)
16,431
4,062
1,205
221
105
21,300
17
24
91
674
258
25
12
18
3,313
1,277
1,561
493
47
11
15
88
493
10
274
9
402
LinkedIn Followers
1,242,676
427,825
150,028
9,718
10,574
619,100
470
461
1,487
12,846
10,748
619
728
n/a
37,295
26,639
19,820
12,407
6,050
229
357
2,691
12,407
84
4,687
1,967
18,587
Twitter Followers (Vendor)
Twitter Followers (Product)
13,985,805
2,831,312
7,727,454
75,601
584,819
154,138
3,930
15,364
7,202
11,300
12,713
11,536
3,922
7,858
26,994
29,019
47,506
30,540
5,199,032
4,974
52,396
2,162
15,794
319,789
8,833
200,639
135,253
Klout Score (Vendor)
98.0
98.0
84.0
72.0
72.0
88.0
58.0
61.0
61.0
67.0
62.0
27.0
56.0
47.0
79.0
66.0
44.0
62.0
n/a
58.0
53.0
51.0
62.0
65.0
59.0
55.0
71.0
Klout Score (Product)
98.0
81.0
84.0
72.0
45.0
57.0
58.0
61.0
61.0
45.0
62.0
62.0
56.0
47.0
79.0
66.0
44.0
62.0
66.0
58.0
53.0
51.0
43.0
65.0
42.0
55.0
71.0
Glassdoor Rating
4.5
3.9
3.6
4.8
n/a
4.2
n/a
n/a
3.7
3.7
4.3
n/a
n/a
n/a
4.0
4.3
3.0
4.0
4.7
n/a
n/a
3.4
4.0
n/a
2.8
n/a
3.2
Alexa Web Traffic Rank
3
8
589
10,501
3,004
146
25,640
57,407
45,094
523
104,036
206,353
136,887
45,686
502
29,673
30,522
54,413
8,158
44,894
279,195
345,705
54,413
19,328
48,028
43,234
12,356
 

*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question or when data is not publicly available.

**For mobile apps, n/a is displayed for products without a native mobile app or if ratings are not available for an app.


© 2016 G2 Crowd, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2 Crowd’s prior written permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 Crowd disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.