For related software, see our integrated development environment (IDE) software category.
Products appearing on the Rapid Application Development Grid℠ for the first time are Nintex Workflow Platform, Outsystems Platform, and Angular.io.
Products with fewer than 10 reviews are not included on the Grid℠. Some notable products not yet included are K2 Blackpearl, PowerApps, and Zoho Creator. Users of these products are encouraged to visit the Rapid Application Development category and write a review.
# of Reviews | Satisfaction (normalized) | Market Presence | G2 Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FileMaker | 31 |
80 |
70 |
75 |
QuickBase | 62 |
92 |
54 |
73 |
Nintex Workflow Platform | 52 |
76 |
54 |
65 |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com | 13 |
58 |
56 |
57 |
Spring Boot | 22 |
62 |
52 |
57 |
# of Reviews | Satisfaction (normalized) | Market Presence | G2 Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|
django | 44 |
82 |
40 |
61 |
OutSystems Platform | 17 |
68 |
48 |
58 |
# of Reviews | Satisfaction (normalized) | Market Presence | G2 Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ColdFusion | 21 |
5 |
55 |
30 |
# of Reviews | Satisfaction (normalized) | Market Presence | G2 Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Angular.io | 15 |
12 |
28 |
20 |
The Grid℠ represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 Crowd rates rapid application development products algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 Crowd users and data aggregated from online sources and social networks.
Technology buyers can use the Grid℠ to help them quickly select the best rapid application development product for their business and to find peers with similar experiences. For vendors, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid℠ provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.
G2 Crowd rates products and vendors based on reviews gathered from our user community, as well as data aggregated from online sources and social networks. We apply a unique, patent-pending algorithm to this data to calculate the product strength and scores in real time. The Summer 2016 Rapid Application Development Grid℠ report is based off of scores calculated using the G2 Crowd algorithm v2.0 from reviews collected through August 29, 2016. To view the Rapid Application Development Grid℠ with the most recent data, please visit the Rapid Application Development page.
The Satisfaction rating is affected by the following (in order of importance):
The Market Presence score is affected by the following (in order of importance):
Making G2 Crowd research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.
To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 Crowd follows a publicly available categorization methodology. All rapid application development products appearing on the Grid℠ have passed through G2 Crowd's categorization methodology and meet G2 Crowd's category standards.
Many terms that appear regularly across G2 Crowd and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding. These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid℠. A list of standard definitions is available to G2 Crowd users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.
The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and social data collected by G2 Crowd up through August 29, 2016. The ratings may change as the products are further developed, the vendors grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 Crowd updates the ratings on its website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche vendors may become High Performers.
Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. We require the use of a LinkedIn account to validate a G2 Crowd user’s identity and employer. Additionally, we verify all reviews manually. We do not allow users to rate their employer’s products or those of their employer’s competitors. Though we share reviews from business partners (they often contain valuable content), we filter out business partner ratings in our aggregate ratings to avoid bias.
Our G2 Crowd staff does not add any subjective input to the ratings, which are determined algorithmically based on data aggregated from publicly available online sources and social networks. Vendors cannot influence their ratings by spending time or money with us. Only the opinion of real users and data from public sources factor into the ratings.
All products in a G2 Crowd category that have at least 10 reviews from real users of the product are included on the Grid℠. Inviting other users, such as colleagues and peers, to join G2 Crowd and share authentic product reviews will accelerate this process.
If an rapid application development product is not yet listed on G2 Crowd and it fits the market definition above, then users are encouraged to suggest its addition to our Rapid Application Development category.
*Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix Systems, Inc.
FileMaker has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. FileMaker has the largest Market Presence among Rapid Application Development products. 94% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 90% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend FileMaker at a rate of 96%. FileMaker is also in the Desktop Database category.
QuickBase has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. QuickBase received the highest Satisfaction score among Rapid Application Development products. 94% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 95% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend QuickBase at a rate of 89%.
Nintex Workflow Platform has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 96% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 92% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Nintex Workflow Platform at a rate of 91%. Nintex Workflow Platform is also in the Business Process Management category.
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com at a rate of 91%. Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com is also in the Drag and Drop App Development and Platform as a Service (PaaS) categories.
Spring Boot has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 95% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Spring Boot at a rate of 91%.
django has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 98% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 93% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend django at a rate of 91%. django is also in the Python Web Frameworks and Application Server categories.
OutSystems Platform has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend OutSystems Platform at a rate of 95%.
ColdFusion has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 67% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 38% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend ColdFusion at a rate of 67%. ColdFusion is also in the Software Testing and Integrated Development Environment (IDE) categories.
Angular.io has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 93% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Angular.io at a rate of 82%.
FileMaker |
QuickBase |
Nintex Workflow Platform |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com |
Spring Boot |
django |
OutSystems Platform |
ColdFusion |
Angular.io |
Average |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction | ||||||||||
Likely to Recommend |
96% |
89% |
91% |
91% |
91% |
91% |
95% |
67% |
82% |
88% |
Product Going in Right Direction? |
90% |
95% |
92% |
100% |
95% |
93% |
100% |
38% |
93% |
89% |
Satisfaction by Category | ||||||||||
Meets Requirements |
91% |
89% |
85% |
89% |
90% |
93% |
88% |
73% |
87% |
87% |
Ease of Admin |
90% |
92% |
88% |
95% |
90% |
89% |
86% |
81% |
n/a |
89% |
Ease of Doing Business |
91% |
93% |
83% |
95% |
94% |
88% |
94% |
71% |
n/a |
89% |
Quality of Support |
87% |
92% |
76% |
86% |
81% |
83% |
88% |
65% |
79% |
82% |
Ease of Setup |
91% |
90% |
88% |
93% |
90% |
81% |
88% |
78% |
n/a |
87% |
Ease of Use |
91% |
92% |
88% |
88% |
84% |
89% |
92% |
80% |
71% |
86% |
FileMaker |
QuickBase |
Nintex Workflow Platform |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com |
Spring Boot |
django |
OutSystems Platform |
ColdFusion |
Angular.io |
Average |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Promoter Score (NPS) | ||||||||||
Net Promoter Score (NPS) (Range from -100 to +100) |
84 |
68 |
69 |
69 |
68 |
70 |
82 |
-5 |
33 |
60 |
*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question.
Additional product data on customer segments, deployment and implementation, user adoption and ROI, and market presence is displayed below.
FileMaker |
QuickBase |
Nintex Workflow Platform |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com |
Spring Boot |
django |
OutSystems Platform |
ColdFusion |
Angular.io |
Average |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Customers by Size | ||||||||||
Small Business (50 or fewer emp.) | 74% | 28% | 10% | 54% | 14% | 57% | 18% | 33% | 47% | 37% |
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | 13% | 45% | 34% | 23% | 45% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 33% | 31% |
Enterprise ( >1000 emp.) | 13% | 27% | 56% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 41% | 33% | 20% | 30% |
FileMaker |
QuickBase |
Nintex Workflow Platform |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com |
Spring Boot |
django |
OutSystems Platform |
ColdFusion |
Angular.io |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deployment Method | |||||||||
Cloud |
40% |
83% |
17% |
n/a |
50% |
80% |
67% |
44% |
n/a |
On-Premise |
60% |
17% |
83% |
n/a |
50% |
20% |
33% |
56% |
n/a |
Implementation Time | |||||||||
Avg. Months to Go Live |
1.9 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
n/a |
2.8 |
0.7 |
5.6 |
1.8 |
n/a |
Implementation Method | |||||||||
Led by In-House Team |
100% |
94% |
83% |
60% |
100% |
93% |
100% |
83% |
n/a |
Led by Vendor PS |
0% |
0% |
10% |
20% |
0% |
7% |
0% |
0% |
n/a |
Led by 3rd Party |
0% |
6% |
7% |
20% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
17% |
n/a |
Number of Users Purchased | |||||||||
Median Number of Users Bought |
27 |
75 |
375 |
n/a |
n/a |
5 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Contract Term | |||||||||
Avg. Contract Term (Months) |
14 |
7 |
15 |
n/a |
n/a |
2 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
FileMaker |
QuickBase |
Nintex Workflow Platform |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com |
Spring Boot |
django |
OutSystems Platform |
ColdFusion |
Angular.io |
Average |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
User Adoption | ||||||||||
Average User Adoption |
88% |
78% |
62% |
n/a |
48% |
82% |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
72 |
FileMaker |
QuickBase |
Nintex Workflow Platform |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com |
Spring Boot |
django |
OutSystems Platform |
ColdFusion |
Angular.io |
Average |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Payback Period | ||||||||||
Avg. Payback Period (Months) |
3 |
8 |
15 |
n/a |
n/a |
3 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
7 |
FileMaker |
QuickBase |
Nintex Workflow Platform |
Salesforce App Cloud: Force.com |
Spring Boot |
django |
OutSystems Platform |
ColdFusion |
Angular.io |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vendor Information | |||||||||
Vendor Name |
Apple |
Quickbase |
Nintex |
Salesforce |
Pivotal Software |
Django |
OutSystems |
Adobe |
Angular |
Year Founded |
1976 |
1999 |
2006 |
1999 |
2012 |
2005 |
2001 |
1982 |
2014 |
Revenue ($MM) |
$234,000 |
n/a |
n/a |
$6,667 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
$4,796 |
n/a |
Employees on LinkedIn (Vendor) |
117,171 |
211 |
400 |
22,919 |
1,633 |
1 |
507 |
16,166 |
2 |
LinkedIn Followers |
3,058,581 |
2,228 |
11,707 |
660,708 |
40,176 |
145 |
20,053 |
592,231 |
160 |
Twitter Followers (Vendor) |
86,535 |
4,874 |
6,251 |
304,699 |
34,390 |
50,556 |
3,672 |
470,063 |
165,625 |
Twitter Followers (Product) |
4,626 |
4,874 |
6,251 |
304,699 |
10,993 |
50,556 |
3,672 |
10,356 |
165,625 |
Klout Score (Vendor) |
50.0 |
n/a |
57.0 |
87.0 |
70.0 |
57.0 |
54.0 |
89.0 |
64.0 |
Klout Score (Product) |
33.0 |
55.0 |
58.0 |
62.0 |
56.0 |
59.0 |
52.0 |
48.0 |
46.0 |
Glassdoor Rating |
|||||||||
Alexa Web Traffic Rank |
54 |
7,766 |
100,559 |
128 |
30,423 |
6,057 |
63,517 |
104 |
18,696,096 |
*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question or when data is not publicly available.
© 2016 G2 Crowd, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2 Crowd’s prior written permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 Crowd disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.